2014-06-26 11:00發函，截至2014-07-30 15:10 校友回應電郵

From: locksley lai wo lui
To: PuiChing <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 1:03 PM
Subject: 反對用培正之名辦大專

本人雷禮和，1968年級仁社。

本人支持鍾景輝、廖約克、丘成桐…..等學長之呼籲，反對楊國雄、葉賜添等人，於舊禮堂改建之大樓逾半教室，以培正之名，辦一間低水準，乏人申請入讀的大專。

楊葉為求目的，多年來，利用在培正中學及小學校董會，具有投票資源的優勢，通過動用且最後耗盡培正小學，於戰後數十年來，分毫累積的儲備，去加蓋八層課室，供他倆負責的上述招生奇低的大專使用。

因此，香港培正小學儲備耗盡後，並負上巨額不足之餘數，大大影響培正小學未來的發展，使年代久遠的陳舊校舍，更乏款項去改善。

尤更甚者，楊葉等校董，一直拒付承擔供該大專使用而加建八層的建築費，該鉅額建築費，遂由培正小學支付。

據我所知，迄至去年，經多番交涉，該大專只肯象徴式支付二千萬，其餘款項及日後租金，仍未有定案，財政壓力更由培正小學肩擔。

該楊葉之大專開辦多年，課程貧乏，收生極少，在前年中學新舊制一同畢業，大學學位嚴重不夠，但是年，該校只收得120多個學生，去年更慘不忍睹，收得的學生只有3人。
這乏人就讀的大專，缺乏經費純屬當然，按目前其校況收入，建築費自然難以支付，新校舍開辦設施，日後租金，在浸聯會及培正校董會壓力下，培正小學無可躲避，必會繼續承擔。
如此下去，培正小學還有改善的前途嗎？

本人呼籲海內外培正校友們，支持十三位學者校兄的建議。
反對浸聯會中高等教育部、培正中學及培正小學兩校的校董會、楊國雄、葉賜添等人，用（培正）之名，續辦一家低水準的大專，有損培正的高譽。
呼籲培正小學校董會，立刻停止繼續撥款支持該楊葉主理之大專，並追收前欠的建築費及代墊钜款。

雷禮和啟
1968仁社
培正同學會顧問/前會長
2014年6月26日
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

致：香港培正同學會
黎藉冠會長 暨 各副會長 / 常務理事

1968年级仁社，贊同十三位學者校兄，有關立刻停止在培正教育大樓，開辦培正專業書院
的呼吁，並鼎力支持香港培正同學會，就此事件於日後作出一切的續後行動，以保障香港
培正小學的资源，及培正的高水平教育高譽。

承眾社友命，謹此奉告。
雷禮和 (級代表) 啓
2014年 6月 30日

1. 美南德州培正同學會會長 許國華
On Jun 29, 2014, at 8:43 PM,

禮和兄：很多謝你一如往昔的熱心培正同學會及母校校務。
関於支持培正同学会及十三学兄的动議，反对以培正之名办大专一事，
如果所有紅藍兒女都發電郵到培正同學會表示支持，固然是好事。
誠如何李麗梅師母學姊（1956 瑩社）所言，如果再由全球各地培正同學會，
級社之會長，社長及所有支持的校友們一同去函（電郵）支持，深信效果必然更佳。
隨函附上日前我們在候仕頓的美南（德州）培正同學會，所有支持的校友信函，
以作參考。
兄服務培正同學會多年，認識及經常有交流的各地培正同學會會長，同學不計其數，
盼望你能夠將此見議，轉告各地培正同學會，以作參考，並決定是否可行。

祝好！
許國華 ( 1979 昇社 ) 上

2. 美京華盛頓培正同學會前會長 李雪珍
Date: 2014-06-27 21:05 GMT+08:00
Subject: 培正小學禮堂樓意見書

首先, 本人絕對支持雷禮和及十三學長的動議書. 強烈反對培正大專無償地使用培正小學的資源.
培正大專這個行為，正為”慷他人之概”的不負責仼心態作最淋漓的寫照.
而更無理的是要強將物主的名牌除去.
我不清楚禮堂的業權屬誰. 如果屬於浸聯, 為何會通過這個將小學資源蠶食淨盡的方案？
而培正大專的辦學人，不作正途的“盈虧自負” 計劃, 卻去佔別人的便宜, 更是自私自利.
敬請培正大專主辧人自重, 不要辜負在培正所受的教育, 有本事就自食其力.
小學大樓是校友為了小學發展而捐助的.
如要借用, 請簽上雙方都同意的合約并且努力履行全部條欵.
這是本人以愛母校立塲的意見, 但相信大部分校友都有同感, 畢竟我們都是在同一學校,
共渡學習的歲月. 對母校的愛是一樣的.
李雪珍 1968年 仁社

3 美國三藩市培正同學會前副會長 黃如珍

Dear Lai Wo, I also support 香港培正同學會 in this matter.
Thank you for your hard work in protecting our school’s asset.
Isabella 黄如珍 1968 仁社

4. 澳洲悉尼培正同學會前副會長 陳震南律師

禮和 big brother，
Call you but in vain, so I write to you early in the morning.
I support your view concerning the develoment of PUI CHING MIDDLE SCHOOL.
Being a small potato of alumni, my view will not be considered in the management meeting/
Director Meeting of our school.
I suggest that u should set up a facebook page for all alumni to show their disagreement.
After having thousands support, we might have better position to say something.
If u have time, please feel free to phone me at 852 6899 3496.
CHAN CHUN NAM 1976敏社

5. 美國大湖區底特律培正同學會前會長 寇懷誠
2014/6/27 上午4:46
謝謝各位轉來有關「培正大專書院」的消息，才知這所「大專」學校用的是培正小學
校園內方建好的大樓中的8-15樓。
相信興建此大樓，許多的培正同學或以個人名字，或以級社名字（例，我社同學集資
認捐一班房，訂名昇社課室）捐款助建，為的是供培正小學、中學使用。
如今該大樓的一大部分卻不為培正中、小學而用，有違許多同學捐款本意，而參與此
決策的人士，亦無事前照會香港培正同學總會（代表全球培正同學）及有關人士及級社，
實在辜負了同學們愛護母校的美意，願參與成立「培正大專書院」決策之諸公三思。
1969年級昇社同學
寇懷誠 上

6. 美國美南羅省培正同學會副會長 吳秉銳
本人吳秉鋭(1968仁社)，十分同意十三學兄及香港培正同學會此動議！

7. 美國明尼蘇達州双城培正校友聯誼會 黃希明
We are supportive of Pui Ching Alumni Association on the subject issue.
Andrew and Florence Wong
黃希明 (黃逸樵老師侄) 聶聘(梁玉文老師長女)

8. 香港培正同學會 前常務理事 江大惠 ( 香港中文大學講師 )

本人曾在香港中文大學崇基神學院，任教超過廿五年。
崇基神學院行政上雖為中文大學之一部分，但經濟上不受政府支持，自負盈虧。
深知自費辦大專教育的困難。
經費、師資、課程、學位文憑的國際認可、學生、硬件設施，缺一不可。
以今日香港專上教育的戰國環境，培正完全未有加入競爭的條件。
江大惠 ( 1968仁社 )

9. 香港教育學院 課程設計主任 龐憶華博士
辦大專絶不易為，很可能，成為培正的負資產
龐憶華 ( 68 仁社 )

10. 各校友支持香港培正同學會及十三學長建議来文：

敬啓者：
本人（黄漢強）反對个人或机構進一步謀取培正小學資源用於所謂《培 正大專》的營運。
順祝 萭事如意！
黄漢強謹啓（仁社，1968）

11. To :HKPCAA,
I agree with you.
Pao Yen 鮑寅

12. Dear President Michael Lai / Brother Wo,
You can count on my full support. If any assistance required, please let me know. Cheers,
麥應芬Mak Ying Fun ( 1968 )

13. 我贊成你用仁社的名義反對以培正之名辦大專。
陳兆南 仁社 2014年6月27日

14. On Jun 26, 2014, at 8:45 AM, “Casey Sr.”
I fully support our alumni association in this matter.
鄭景鍾 Casey Cheng King-Chung
Class of 1968

15. Dear Lai & Milky,
我亦不讚成培正去開辦大專/副學士， 因聘良師 , 已是問題 。
收生不足 , 引致收支不平衡 , 問題更大。
傳聞東華三院的副學士課程開辦多年 , 仍然虧本。 培正實無把握成功争一席位。
陳泰裕 ( 1968 仁社 )

16. From David Lo ：

办大專当然不易為。但不知那些人的理念是什麼。
當年浸大何嘗不是在培正办出来的？理念和投机可是两回事。
如果培正大專如此不濟，及不應該， 故應該用最大効力的媒介，去告訴全球
培正人去阻撓。
盧永雄 ( 1968 仁社 )

17. 本人彭國柱，1991年級社
本人支持鍾景輝、廖約克、丘成桐…..等學長之呼籲和提議，立刻停止繼續撥款支持
該楊葉主理之大專，並追收前欠的建築費及代墊钜款。
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Benjamin Chui
To: HK Puiching <[email protected]>;
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 3:19 PM
Subject: RE: 致各位培正校友

Dear Michael Lai, President of HKPCAAL,

You get our fully suppose to deal with the matter arising from Pui Ching Academy. Attached an article to express my feeling on the issue.

Benjamin Chui 徐兆敏會長
SydPCAA 悉尼培正同學會
____________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Doris Tsui
To: ‘HK PUI CHING ALUMNI’ <[email protected]>
Cc: Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 7:19 PM
Subject: RE: 致各位培正校友

To HK Pui Ching Alumni Associations
We, the New Zealand Auckland Pui Ching Alumni Association oppose the establishment of a privately funded higher education institute in the new education building of Pui Ching Primary School.

Fred Tsui徐德輝會長
President
The New Zealand Auckland Pui Ching Alumni Association
紐 西 蘭 奧 克 蘭 培 正 同 學 會
______________________________________________________________________________________________

From: Frank F. Chin
To: 培正 <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 6:57 AM
Subject: 專業學院
鄙人哀心請求 各位校監及校董 停止在培正開辦專業學院 以維持培正校風 則感激不已 謝謝
波士頓 陳振煥 (1953 誠社)
Frank F. Chin, Chairman, New England (Boston) Pui Ching Alumni Association
2014年6月26日
______________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Pui Ching School Alumni Association of Ontario
To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, July 5, 2014 12:53 PM
Subject: 加拿大安省培正同學會反對培正專業書院佔用培正小學 新建之大樓數層開辦副學士課程

致香港培正同學會會長黎籍冠學長:

本會得知培正專業書院正進行佔用培正小學 新建之大樓數層開辦副學士課程後, 綜合所得資料於六月三十日本會月會中討論, 理事一致認為此舉實屬不合時宜之極, 不符培正教育理念以及濫用培正資源. 其後果不免令培正光榮傳統䝉汚, 令培正负擔財赤及大損校譽. 故此本會為此堅決反對此事之進行. 並且正告專業書院之主使者勿冒紅藍精神之大不韙而一意孤行, 則培正幸甚.

加拿大安省培正同學會
會長劉永安 (1978英社)
_____________________________________________________________________________________

From: Ian Ung
To: HK PUI CHING ALUMNI <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 5:58 PM
Subject: Re: 致各位培正校友

黎會長大鑒，
來函獲悉一切，本會同意及支持培正同學總會的立場。
吳仁灼 剛社
英國培正同學會
_______________________________________________________________________________________
From: LA Pui Ching Alumni
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2014 3:01 PM
Subject:

反對以培正之名佔用香港培正小學
新建大樓第8至15層辦大專院校

洛杉磯培正同學會先後收到（一）香港培正同學會會長黎藉冠學長、（二）鍾景輝、丘成棡等十三位學長、及（三）香港培正同學會前仼會長雷禮和學長之電郵（見附件）。他們呼籲培正校友反對任何人士佔用由培正舊禮堂改建大樓的8至15樓，以培正名義辦「培正專業書院」。

吾等雖僑居南加州但愛護母校之心絕無輕減。對培正小學新大樓之使用極之關切。故以至真至誠之心、至善至正之理，謹發出此聯署聲名以支持黎雷會長及鍾丘等學長反對佔用培正小學新建大樓第8至15層辦大專院校。

洛杉磯培正同學會董事會
陳文珠（主席）江心敏 許世榮 劉國焜 吳秉銳 梁愛芙
洛杉磯培正同學會全體職員
吳秉銳（會長）黃齡兒（副會長）李芳 朱念之 何法賢 蔡敏儀
洛杉磯培正同學會前會長 黃文輝

公曆2014年七月一日

From: Norman Wong <[email protected]>
To: 培正校董會, 浸聯會教育部
Cc: <[email protected]>; ‘Michael Lai 黎藉冠會長’ “‘雷禮和
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2014 1:15 PM
Subject: Concerns for 培正專業書院

July 24, 2014
To: 培正校董會, 浸聯會教育部
C.c.: 培正校友
Subject: Concerns

Dear Sirs/Madame:
As an alum of 培正, I am greatly concerned over the recent allegations which have been raised about 培正專業書院. A sample of these are: the mission of the institution, the possession of 培正小學新大樓 (some floors), the using of 培正’s name, the target market it serves, the timeliness of adding another post-secondary institution in a diminishing market, the “borrowing” of 培小’s funds and using 培小 as guarantor for additional financing. All these are serious accusations affecting the prestige and financial well being of 培正. Thus far, many alum like me have not heard from 校董會or 浸聯會 and would appreciate hearing from you to allay our concerns for the future of 培正. 請澄清一下.
We are pleased there will be a forum on August 2nd to discuss these issues in Hong Kong. Regrettably, most of us overseas alum will not be able to attend, but hope it will be an open, productive session in which all parties will work towards the betterment and a unified 培正 going forward.
Thank you for your dedication to 培正. May God bless you for your hard work.
Sincerely,

Norman Wong黄文輝
培正正社1960 校友
前洛杉磯培正同學會會長
___________________________________________________________________________________
From: Steve Chin
To: HK PUI CHING ALUMNI <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, July 5, 2014 11:30 AM
Subject: Re: 致各位培正校友

敬啟者:

在貴會向全世界培正同學公佈“培正專科書院”一事的實情，真相後，引起許多同學會，級社以 及個別同學們的關注及反對，在此同時全球培正同學們也正注視此事件的後續發展。

本大湖區培正同學會亦在第一時間（七月五日）以電郵告知貴會黎會長本區培正同學一致支持 培正同學總會及十三位學者的立場，反對“培專” 使用培正小學校舍及該所“專科書院”冠以“培 正”校名。同時我等亦極為留意此事件的後續發展。

本大湖區同學會再次以正式函件表達對現在“培正專科書院”情勢發展的嚴正立場：

1) 不反對香港浸聯會成立專科書院，但堅決反對該專科書院使用培正校名。
2) 反對“培正專科書院”使用培正小學任何校舍。

在此同時，於“培正專科書院”網站上列出修畢該專科書院課程的學生，其學分可以銜接台灣二十三間大學。不少培正同學曾在台灣升讀大學 (例如本區的錢元國，寇懷誠等) ， 對台灣各大專院校的水準都有一定的認識，台灣一流的大學有台灣大學，成功大學，清華大學，台北科技大學（前身是台北工專），輔仁大學，政治大學, 師範大學等 , 而這二十三間大學，卻無任何一間名列其中。令吾等不禁質疑這些“培專”畢業出來的學生素質何在? 辦理教育之事乃千秋大業, 萬不可兒戲。望諸公三思。

在此亦呼籲浸聯會及培正學校執事諸公，懸崖勒馬，停辦以培正為名的專科書院，維持培正得 來不易的百年校譽，將培正小學受到的傷害降至最低，使培正小學能得到應有的發展，此乃我 培正學校的萬幸，相信亦是絕大部份培正同學的衷心所願。

此致

香港培正同學總會 黎藉冠 會長

大湖區培正同學會 謹上
會長 錢元國 （1967 恆社）
副會長 胡斯德 （1973 勤社）
二零一四年七月二十日
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Kay Loong <
To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 1:24 PM
Subject: Re: 培正專業書院

謝謝香港培正同學會寄來有関培正專業書院的資料.
本人不贊成現在設立副學士課程. 認為倉卒地去開辦高等教育, 對整體培正將來的發展, 是極大的資源錯配. 非眀智之舉.
龍基逸 （1957 輝社）
澳洲坎培拉培正同學會

From: Jeffrey Ku (TELUS)
To: ‘HK PUI CHING ALUMNI’ <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2014 1:12 AM
Subject: RE: 致各位培正校友

黎會長：
温哥華培正同學會諸位理事皆反對母校開辧副學士課程，我們願全力支持同學會在此事上的立場並盼黎會長能替我們在來件中加簽温哥華培正同學會反對的聲明。
除此之外，我們亦會再集合更多在温哥華培正同學反對的聲音，另函寄上。

祝 安康！
顧曾輝 （77 傑社）
温哥華培正同學會會長 暨理事會
___________________________________________________________________________________
From: Pui Ching DC
To: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 12:18 AM
Subject: 反對用培正之名辦大專

香港培正同學會:

美京培正同學會及成員絕對支持雷禮和及各學長的動議書，強烈反對培正大專無償地使用培正小學的資源， 而更無理的是要強將小學的名牌除去。本會呼籲培正小學校董會立刻停止繼續撥款支持培正大專, 並追收前欠的建築費及代墊鉅款。

會長吳堉洲
美京培正同學會
___________________________________________________________________________________

From: Robin Lau
To: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2014 11:18 AM
Subject: 加拿大渥太華(加京)培正同學會堅决反對培正專業書院利用培正小學教育大樓開辦副學士課程

致香港培正同學會會長黎籍冠學長:

日前(六月二十五日)收到貴會寄來的電郵及信件，得知培正專業書院計劃利用培正小學新建成的教育大樓開辦副學士等課程的消息。本人即時將電郵及附件轉寄與加拿大渥太華(加京)培正同學會各位學友。
此函代表本人及加拿大渥太華(加京)培正同學會支持鍾景輝、廖約克、丘成桐…..等十三位學長之呼籲，堅決反對培正專業書院利用培正小學教育大樓開辦副學士課程. 因為此舉絕對有損培正中學在中國和海外的優良校譽.

加拿大渥太華(加京)培正同學會
會長劉永堂(1976捷社)
____________________________________________________________________________________

致:香港培正同學會
加拿大亞省培正同學會十分關注在培正教育大樓開辦培正專業書院的事件.經商討後，所有出席討論的校友都一致反對培正專業書院佔用香港培正小學新建大樓第8 至15 層辦大專院校.謹發此聲明來表達本會對此事的意見.
敬祝安康
亞省培正同學會
2014 年7 月12 日

顧錚(會長1970 謙社) 陳潔明(1976 捷社) 蔡業健(1960 正社) 羅衍深(1969 昇社) 譚杰(1958 銳社)
陳康年(副會長1975 昕社) 周衍慶(1976 捷社) 祝定聰(1952 偉社) 馬妙影(1970 謙社) 鄧維武(1972 賢社)
黃楚珊(1975 昕社 周述忠(1952 偉社) 鍾兆芳(1953 誠社) 潘志強(1960 正社) 謝清華(1956 瑩社)
楊友信(1938 融社) 楊光浩(1969 昇社) 羅慧嘉(1958 銳社) 劉淑琪(1970 謙社)
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Pui Ching Alumni – Sacramento Chapter美國二埠(加省會)培正同學會
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2014 7:49 AM
Subject: 要求培正校董會撤銷容許培正專業書院使用培正教育大樓

黎藉冠會長,

美國加省省會培正校友會得接香港培正同學會來信有關培正專業書院使用培正教育大樓之事件. 本會徵詢各位同學意見現得下列各位同學支持香港培正同學會, 要求培正校董會撤銷容許培正專業書院使用培正教育大樓, 保我培正聲名及產權不受損害.

羅根合(匡社) 譚淑儀(英社) 陳永建(善群社) 蔣奕鷗(㨗社) 陳雁鸞(恒社) 吳炳威(偉社)
朱永朝(協社) 何 東 關肇祉(鋒社) 劉玉蘭 李福暢(忠社) 李文烈
梁喜明(堅社) 屈卓立 曾昭權(謙社), 黃 犇(昕社) 楊寵健(輝社) 余樹鴻(1949春班)

敬啟
________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: “LAO, Paul O. K.
To: HK PUI CHING ALUMNI <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 9:39 AM
Subject: 停止在培正教育大樓開辦培正專業學院–RE: 致各位培正校友

香港培正同學會 黎會長,

謹此表達個人同意13位著名校友學者簽署之“校友的呼聲”文中論述 及呼籲,
本人希望母校能停止在培正教育大樓開辦培正專業學院。

劉安乾 (1967恆社)
台灣培正校友聯誼會
__________________________________________________________________________

From: 美中(芝加哥)培正同學會
To: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2014 5:17 AM
Subject: Re: 致各位培正校友

致： 香港培正同學會
黎藉冠會長

各位校友
來函得悉香港培正教育大樓近況，美中(芝加哥)培正同學會深表關注。透過同學會的公開信以及部份校友的回應，我們對事情的發展有了初步的了解，並在例會中進行了詳細的討論。考慮到培正教育大樓籌辦經年，校友們多有參與募捐，向來有責任在維持校譽，以及新校舍的使用上提出意見，並支持香港同學會代表各地校友為事件發聲。對於來信《校友的呼聲》中提及的校譽影響，我們認為校方須謹慎行事。先賢建立培正校名校譽不易，決不能因少數人缺乏前瞻，甚或錯誤的決定，而將多年來培正建立的品牌毀於一旦。
另特此提出下列意見：
1. 仁社雷禮和指出建立培專所需加蓋八層課室，支出轉嫁耗盡培小多年儲備。校友們雖無從得知實際情況，但這樣的行為是絕對不允許的，為甚麼校董會容許上述事情的發生？
2. 即使在某角度下培正專業學院(下稱培專)有其存在價值，其財政理應自負盈虧，可經由學院方面自行籌集，不應與中小學部拉上關係，影響培正最基本辦學的情況。培正教育大樓已建成，已耗用的資金已無法追回。一方面培專必須清還所有之前挪用培小的資金，以滿足培小發展維護之用。另一方面須確保在未來的發展上，盡可能避免使用中小學部的資源以供培專自身的運作，影響培正中小幼的教學質素。
3. 聽聞七月初將對現有於培正教育中心上的「香港培正小學」招牌清拆，換上「培正專業學院」，我們認為雖涉及大樓的使用權問題，但毫無疑問新大樓的用地是培正小學的一部份，當初募捐計劃上指出重建小學禮堂，新大樓無論如何都是主要供小學之用。「香港培正小學」絕對不容清拆再換上「培正專業學院」。而鬧出整幢大樓培小在用但又掛培專名牌的笑話。
4. 對於來信中提及培專收生水平一事，我們認為追溯培正傳統的教育方針，先賢有教無類的精神以及其教育哲學，並不只是收精英學生回來教育他們如何保持其優秀本質。雖然培正向來都能達到優異的教育成果，「至善至正」從來沒有對於如何的人才能成為培正學生提出條件。固對此負面言詞持有保留態度。另外，我們認為此論點必然會在校友間及社會中，甚至報章上可能引發些對培正誤解的反對聲音，希望同學會對此言三思。
5. 最後，若然培專收生多了，龍蛇混集，毗鄰培正小學，家長難免擔心學子安全。多年來培正中小學雖二部相鄰，但二部校舍依然分開，這表示培正小學需有一定鬲離。一旦多有學生出入新大樓，培小難免要在現有的保安措施上作出一定程度上的適應。該筆支出，包括增聘人手及加裝保安設備等的費用及責任該由何方承擔？
培正校友間向來相親相愛，縱有意見不同，我們亦應能通過對話解決。在此重申，美中(芝加哥)培正同學會，代表下列同學，支持香港培正同學會對培正專業書院見解，反對培正專業書院侵犯培正小學的行為。

敬候 佳祉
美中(芝加哥)培正同學會
二零一四年六月
附： 美中(芝加哥)培正同學會聯署

美中(芝加哥)培正同學會聯署名單:
梅松沛 忠社 梅榮輝 忠社 陳大成 恆社 黃敏傑 偉社 黃能輔 偉社
謝保羅 匡社 潘敏荷 勤社 謝鴻基 匡社 莫權英 昭社 黃創文 耀社
丘超濂 光社 李曜東 恆社 林惠祥 耀社 張文明 銳社 關德深 恆社
林 華 輝社 周兆禧 善社 陳文偉 驁社 林兆輝 正社 梁茂和 真社
_________________________________________________________________________________________________

敬啟者:

在貴會向全世界培正同學公佈“培正專科書院”一事的實情，真相後，引起許多同學會，級社以及個別同學們的關注及反對，在此同時全球培正同學們也正注視此事件的後續發展。

本大湖區培正同學會亦在第一時間（七月五日）以電郵告知貴會黎會長本區培正同學一致支持 培正同學總會及十三位學者的立場，反對“培專” 使用培正小學校舍及該所“專科書院”冠以“培 正”校名。同時我等亦極為留意此事件的後續發展。

本大湖區同學會再次以正式函件表達對現在“培正專科書院”情勢發展的嚴正立場：

1) 不反對香港浸聯會成立專科書院，但堅決反對該專科書院使用培正校名。
2) 反對“培正專科書院”使用培正小學任何校舍。

在此同時，於“培正專科書院”網站上列出修畢該專科書院課程的學生，其學分可以銜接台灣二十三間大學。不少培正同學曾在台灣升讀大學 (例如本區的錢元國，寇懷誠等) ， 對台灣各大專院校的水準都有一定的認識，台灣一流的大學有台灣大學，成功大學，清華大學，台北科技大學（前身是台北工專），輔仁大學，政治大學, 師範大學等 , 而這二十三間大學，卻無任何一間名列其中。令吾等不禁質疑這些“培專”畢業出來的學生素質何在? 辦理教育之事乃千秋大業, 萬不可兒戲。望諸公三思。

在此亦呼籲浸聯會及培正學校執事諸公，懸崖勒馬，停辦以培正為名的專科書院，維持培正得 來不易的百年校譽，將培正小學受到的傷害降至最低，使培正小學能得到應有的發展，此乃我 培正學校的萬幸，相信亦是絕大部份培正同學的衷心所願。

此致

香港培正同學總會 黎藉冠 會長

大湖區培正同學會 謹上
會長 錢元國 （1967 恆社）
副會長 胡斯德 （1973 勤社）
二零一四年七月二十日
_________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Stephen K. Seung
To<[email protected]>;
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 3:00 AM
Subject:

致 : 培正校名管理委員會
抄送:培正校友會會長黎籍冠
雷禮和

海內外培正同學會 培正校刊

我們美東校友會最近收到黎籍冠會長和雷禮和會長的來函。拜讀之餘，深感震驚。如果所言屬實，我們將會聯合發動全世界海內外校友群起而追究此事之來龍去脈，以保護我培正百年之高譽。為此希望，貴委員會迅速對上述兩位會長之指控作出回應。對成立[培正專業書院]之決定係基於何種法理基礎及何人授權其經費來源及支出的詳盡有關事宜作出公開透明的交待，以解全體海內外培正人之懸念。
此致
各位委員
美東培正同學會

From: Daniel Lew <[email protected]>
To: HongKong PuiChing <[email protected]>;
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 10:07 PM
Subject: 反對用培正之名辦大專
致:香港培正同學會黎藉冠會長
各位紅藍同學
卡加利培正同學會聯署名單:
_______________________________________________________________________________________

From: Norman Wong
To: ‘Shiu Yan Ding’ <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 3:15 AM
Subject: FW: Revised Draft–請澄清培正專業書院目標

July 21, 2014
To: 浸聯會高, 中, 小教育部
C.c.: 培正校友
Subject: 請澄清培正專業書院目標

I have been following intently the numerous letters alleging 培正專業書院’s taking over of 培正小學新大樓 (some floors), the using of 培正’s name, the “borrowing” of 培小’s funds and using 培小 as guarantor for additional borrowing of funds. All this sounds wrong. But I would like to hear from 浸聯會 their rebuttal of these allegations. Please give me your point of view (澄清).
Many decades ago, 黄啓明故校長 dreamed of founding a 培正大學. But look at how many universities there were at that time-one. Perhaps, if it were not for his early demise, he would have started a 培正大學, in the 1940’s! Fast forward to the 1950’s: 林子豐校長, Dr. Maurice Anderson, 譚希天董事 and 黃汝光校監 plus others spent countless months and years planning a Baptist College. It was a successful endeavor. Of course, Baptist College had a rough start, but the timing was right, there was a need and most of all: it was well planned. Look where Baptist University is today.
I do not wish to repeat all the allegations of others, but I surely wish to hear from the instigators of the 培正專業書院 as to what went though their minds when they said “Let’s start a college”. I like to encourage runners to fight on when encountering rough roads (為他們打氣). But when their objectives are not clear, and when others are being hurt in the process, then I would suggest the runner to stop and reconsider their mission.
Also, it is my humble opinion that Church and Academics should be separate. 培正 is an academic Institution and a very fine one at that. Its strategic planning should not be dictated by religious persuasions. It is good to have religion as a moral and ethical beacon, but not on strategies of where to invest in education and academics.
Thank you very much for your attention. May God bless you for all your hard work.

Sincerely,
Norman Wong黄文輝
培正正社1960 校友
____________________________________________________________________________________________

培正1953年級誠社同學聲援

誠社聯署: 香港培正同學會特邀常務 吳漢榆
香港培正同學會永遠名譽會長 朱淑齡
香港培正同學會永遠名譽會長 高澤霖
香港培正同學會永遠名譽會長 陳毓棠
馬秋南, 容寶琛, 朱蘊瑜, 鄺錦杰, 翁仕球, 楊如松, 李君聰(高代)
2014-06-26
___________________________________________________________________________________
From: Dr. YEUNG Ching Kong
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 12:21 PM
To: ‘[email protected]回覆。Urgent’
Subject:

本人支持 “校友的呼聲” , 堅决反對設立培專 。

Ching-kong Yeung 楊靜剛 (1971 剛社)
______________________________________________________________________________________________

From: Luk Dick Sang
To: ‘[email protected]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 8:41 PM
Subject: Re: 反对用培正之名办大专

本人極力反對以培正名義開辦專上學院。
1995 健社代表
陸迪生
______________________________________________________________________________________________
From: T M Chan
To: HK PUI CHING ALUMNI <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 6:27 PM
Subject: Re: 致各位培正校友

Dear Michael
I fully support

Chan tze mun陳子敏
______________________________________________________________________________________________
From: chung ling hui許仲鸝
To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>;
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 11:45 AM
Subject: RE: 致各位培正校友

Dear Mr. Michael Lai
Fully support you. Kindly let me know if I could be of any help in this campaign.Thank you for your effort in protecting Pui Ching’s good name.
Yours sincerely
Hui Chung Ling Margaret
King Society 1981
________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Kit Ho
To: HK PUI CHING ALUMNI <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 12:01 PM
Subject: Re: 致各位培正校友

Support! Thx for the detail.

何杰群 1990騰社
________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Hyman Luk
To: HK PUI CHING ALUMNI [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 2:39 PM
Subject: Re: 致各位培正校友

本人返對用培正之名辦大專。

陸効民1991勇社
培正同學會常務理事
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

From: Herbert Chan
To: HK PUI CHING ALUMNI <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: 致各位培正校友
會長,
本人同意你的觀點。
英社陳德華敬上
______________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Sam Chung
To: Puiching Alumni <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 11:55 AM
Subject: Re: 致各位培正校友

本人支持 “校友的呼聲”

林文量博士(1985年博社)
香港大學生物科學學院副教授

谷德權博士(1987年德社)
香港大學科技研究所所長

鍾樹森牧師(1985年博社)

我們是1985年級博社的同學，我們支持培正同學會針對培正專業書院所發〈校友的呼聲〉意見！

林 艷 蔣翠儀 葉頴婷 許柱樑 汪定武
黃思賢 吳秀蘭 顏耀明 吳麗華 聶子淮
黃少群 林聖寵 周巍屹 伍思楹 辛德潤
吳黛薇 邱嘉敏 何培桂 何寶華 林惠芬
區佩瑤 梁 斌 朱自明 何培桂 余 銘
鍾樹森 陳筱玲 徐麗寧 卓逸瑜 劉登群
楊天恩 余立康 林文量 馬文昌 李志成
趙慧玲 曾廣財
______________________________________________________________________________________________

From: Joseph Kong
To: HK PUI CHING ALUMNI <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 3:32 PM
Subject: Re: 致各位培正校友

本人同意各學長的意見，回覆以示支持。
鄺啟聰
一九九五 健社社長
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Chuck Li
To: the hk pc alumni association limited香港培正同學会有限公司 <[email protected]>
Cc: PUI CHING <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 3:40 PM
Subject: Re: 致各位培正校友

本人支持黎會長倡議撤銷在培小校園內辦培專。
李澤民1966 皓社
________________________________________________________________________________________________

From: Ngai Hok Yan (Troika)
To: ‘HK PUI CHING ALUMNI’ <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 5:18 PM
Subject: RE: 致各位培正校友

本人堅決反對培正專業書院僭佔教育大樓!
NGAI Hok Yan倪學仁 1976敏社
AP RSE RGE RI
Troika Engineering Limited
Flat C, 10/F European Asian Bank Building
749 Nathan Road
Kowloon
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: SunVictor
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 5:33 PM
Subject: RE: 致各位培正校友

本人愿意支持附和同學會之意见。

孫必勝
1955 年 忠社
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
From: elbert-th
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 7:19 PM

我本人羅光凱，1969年畢業（昇社）支持撒销副學士課程。
________________________________________________________________________________________________

From: 何永年
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 7:23 PM
Subject: 同意十三位培正學者學長的”反對”意見 …

致香港培正同學總會,
在下同意十三位培正學者學長的意見，反對”培正專業書院”佔用培正小學校舍, 更反對一切向培正小學融资的進行!

何永年(一九六五耀社),
________________________________________________________________________________________________

From: Charles Gmail
To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 10:15 PM
Subject: 停止開辦培正專業学院

本人張卓立百份百反对開辦培正專業学院。

張卓立 香港 註冊牙科医生
1953香港培正小学畢業
1959 香港培正中学 光社 畢業
________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Alan Tong
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 5:37 PM
Subject: 致各位培正校友

致各昇社同學：

我今天收到香港培正同學會會長的來函，號召各級社支持，反對香港培正專業書院招生開辦副學士等課程(見下文及附件)。

個人而言，我自昇社畢業25週年即1994年開始，任培正副會長至2000年，其間接觸校友較多，下列聯署的學者，我認識鍾景輝、廖約克、丘成桐、劉紀美，他們都是具真知灼見的正人君子，又由於我過去四十年，一直執業課室視聽工程，對教育界的發展和困難頗為了解，對香港培正專業書院招生開辦副學士等課程，我是深感擔憂和十分反對的。

作為昇社的代表，我謹希望昇社及各同學支持黎藉冠會長和下列聯署校友的看法，要求校監、校董，撤銷此案，並立即停止在培正教育大樓開辦培正專業書院。由於事情緊急，假若有不同意的同學，請於7月1日前表態及列明理由，我擬於下星期內給予香港培正同學會答覆。

唐世煌
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Kim-pok Wong
To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 8:59 PM
Subject: 反對培正專業書院

本人張儉樸是1965 年 (耀社) 畢業生. 為了保存培正光榮的歴史, 我堅強反對用培正校名建立專業書院.
作為培正校友我要求馬上停止建設這個書院.
張儉樸,
______________________________________________________________________________________________

From: Wilson Hon
To: ‘HK PUI CHING ALUMNI’ <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 10:16 PM
Subject: 致各位培正校友

Agree with香港培正同學會會長 黎藉冠 Michael Lai
Agree with培正同學會顧問/前會長雷禮和
Best regards,
Wilson Hon 韓治平 (晶社)
培正同學會顧問
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Hon
To: “[email protected]”
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 10:06 PM
Subject: Urgent!!!

本人梁永瀚（1986年晶社），絕對支持「反對香港培正專業書院在新落成的培正教育大樓八至十五層開辦副學士等課程」！並強烈要求把五至十八層盡快交回母校作為中小學教學用途。另有關於2013年一此董事曾企圖背住母校，將新建成的教育大樓按與香港政府，以取得1.8億港元貸款經營培正專業書院與以強烈譴責！
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: KB Fung
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 11:16 PM
Subject: 培正專業書院閤題

我同意培正教育大樓在目前情況不應借給培正專業書院用。否則㑹影響培正小學與中學學生情緒及作業等。培正之名得來不易。不要毀之一旦。請各位熟思。

馮奇彬醫生，1956瑩社
歷任美南培正同學㑹㑹長十一年
Kee-Bun Fung, MD, DMRD, FRCP(C), FCCP
Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
悉尼澳大利亞 1978年級英社陳震威 來郵:

關於培正專業書院，嘗聞從善如流，今睹專上院校之怵目，改弦更張，客觀事實作主，其去向亦毋庸爭議，余以撤銷為當前急務，以免陷泥不拔，皆為人笑。

1978年級英社陳震威 謹稟
2014-06-27
_________________________________________________________________________________
From: Raymond Ng
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 1:13 AM
Subject: 聯絡同學會

本人支持鍾景輝、廖約克、丘成桐…..等學長之呼籲，反對楊國雄、葉賜添等人，於舊禮堂改建之
大樓逾半教室，以培正之名，辦一間低水準，乏人申請入讀的大專。

吳秉鋭
1968年級仁社
_________________________________________________________________________________________________

From: wingcheuk ng
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 1:56 AM
Subject: 回覆︰ 反对用培正之名办大专

在現今之教育制度，學生人數等條件下，辦私立大專實如自掘墳墓。最終可能需大舉向內地招生求存，更難講什麼教育理念。故本人1989年禮社吳榮卓反對以培正名義辦專上學校。

1989年禮社級社代表 吳榮卓
培正同學會常務理事
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Luk Dick Sang 於 2014年06月26日 (週四) 8:41 PM 寫道﹕

本人極力反對以培正名義開辦專上學院。

陸迪生1995 健社代表
培正同學會常務理事
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: “Lawrence
To: HK PUI CHING ALUMNI <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 6:12 PM
Subject: Re: 致各位培正校友

致: 香港培正同學會會長及各會內學兄學弟:

本人是 1982年駿社 丘子偉 (Lawrence Yau), 看到有關黎會長的信函, 本人有著下列的疑問先想弄清楚才可以向校方管理層作出反對或贊成的表述:

1) 黎會長文中說: 【現在開辦培專書院，不知有否通過可行性研究, 有否周詳的財務預算計劃( Financial Budget Plan)】 , 那究竟真實情況是有或是沒有, 如果有的能否給大家參詳他們當初決定的理據; 如果是沒有的, 那麼當年他們憑甚麼可以決定這個大項目呢?

2) 培正小學張廣德校長因何可以自決交出鎖匙, 據了解, 張廣德校長擔任本校校長只有很短的時間, 他應該沒有李仕浣校長咁資深及了解當務校政運作的來龍去脈, 他是從那裡獲得實權把鎖匙交出共容許校舍裝修呢?

3) 黎會長文中對培專的收生評議較不看好, 從資料得知, 黎會長於2012年擔任會長, 當時你有沒有把你對培專的收生意見帶入校管會, 讓各理事討論有關情況呢? 如果有, 當時的結論是怎麼樣呢? 能否告知大家呢?

4) 一所學院的興辦是經年累月的, 因何現在突然有這樣的急事發生了, 當中是否有些重要的議題討論過而我們的校友是不知道呢? 如果現在在不了解情況下倉卒向校管會提出反對意見, 是否有欠公允呢?

祝校政事務能順利推行!

Lawrence Yau
26-Jun-2014
_________________________________________________________________________________________________

From: Sie Han Lam
To: “[email protected]”
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 2:30 AM
Subject: 培正辦副學士課程

本人同意同學會反對培正專業書院借用培正教育大樓辦副學士課程.不合時宜,影响校譽。近年培正領導層常以黃啓明故校長辦大學遺願為藉口一意弧行.須知年代相距數十年,世界經過二次大戰,中國己歷抗戰,內戰情勢已全不同,香港已由英殖民地回歸,當年只有一所香港大學,現在公立8所,私立大學8所.私立專上學院19所. 現在大學經費較當年高千百倍,民間經營談何容易.黃校長若在生,想亦會改變主意,而且相信他希望的絕不會是一間九流學院.回憶五十年代成立浸會書院時,是一個好時機,何以揭幕前棄”培正”名而用”浸會”?八九十年代又高舉黄校長旌旗辦了花都培正商學院,却淪為私產,且上演搶註醜聞!以致掃出家門. 可以休矣,勿再陷黄校長於不義!

林錫衡於温哥華
1955級忠社
________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Harry Tsang
Subject: Use of PuiChing Middle School building
Date: June 26, 2014 at 8:43:08 AM HST
To: [email protected]

My Name is Harry Tsang Chuen-fong曾全方(瑩社), retired Computer-Specialist from New York City Human Resources Administration. Harry Tsang is against any illegal use of Pui Ching Middle School building or properties.
________________________________________________________________________________________________

From: 林翠微
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 3:46 AM
Subject: Fwd: 培正辦副學士課程

Fellow lighters,

Sent to me by May Lam ( 林翠微, 1976, 敏社, 林英豪先生的女兒).
________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Wan Han Lam
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 3:48 AM
Subject: Re: Objection of using Pui Ching’s new building for higher education
Hello
My name is Wan-Han Lam from Washington, D.C in the U.S., alumni of class of 1975.
I strongly object by turning the new building for higher education, I saw no future of the proposal.
Please leave Pui Ching Primary School alone.

Regards
Wan Han Lam
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Tingyeung Wang
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 4:56 AM
Subject: 同意十三位學者學長的意見

有關培正專業書院事，本人同意十三位學者學長的意見。

一九六五耀社王定揚簽名
_________________________________________________________________________________________________

From: Stephen Choy
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 1:29:51 PM
Subject: Re: 致各位培正校友

錫衡学兄，
我願意支持及附和香港培正同学会反対香港培正專业書院借用培正教育大楼䦕辦副学士課程

Stephen Choy, 蔡子良
忠社，1955
NUS (National University of Singapore), Mathematics.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Carisa Chu
To: HK PUI CHING ALUMNI <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 8:44 AM
Subject: Re: 致各位培正校友

請撤銷設立培專。Thanks,

朱曉彤 (1991勇社)
________________________________________________________________________________________________

From: S. S. Lau
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 5:02 AM
Subject: Re: 有關培正專業書院

各位正社同學,

Please see the two forwarded messages below, concerning the 培正專業書院 issue, for your information.
Before you read these message, please note that :

1. When we were at PC ( 林子豐,黃汝光, 譚希天時代) , 浸聯會 (BC) 與培正是兩位一體. 同聲同氣.

2. Over the last 50 some years, things have changed to a large extent. BC’s attitude is now quite different.

3.The view point of HKPCAA ( 香港培正同學會) and PCPS (培正小學) is that BC is unfriendly, as shown by two recent invasive events.
BC tries to “ hostile takeover” the properties of PCPS, for the personal gain of a small group of people within BC.

4.BC’s alleged point of view is to advance education, and to establish a sub-degree program, in the name of PC.

These two points of view are diametrically opposite to each other.

5. All of us here are 培正同學, many of us are 浸聯會員, we now must judge which view is closer to the truth.—

SSL劉紹偉(光社)
_________________________________________________________________________________________________

From: Philip
To: “[email protected]”
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 6:06 AM
Subject: 楊葉主理之大專 學店

我是1965 耀社 畢業生 黎浩康 .
我 absolutely 反對浸聯會中高等教育部、培正中學及培正小學兩校的校董會、楊國雄、葉賜添等人，
用（培正）之名，續辦一家低水準的大專，有損培正的高譽。

培正小學校董會, 應該 立刻停止繼續撥款支持該楊葉主理之大專，並追收前欠的建築費及代墊钜款。

黎浩康
p.s. 、楊國雄 and 葉賜添 ought to be hanged by their nuts.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Elizabeth T S Chan Houang
To: “[email protected]”
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 8:04 AM
Subject: Fwd: 致各位培正校友

我支持你們的呼聲信。

黃亭秀（1962旭社）CUHK MEDlCINE
Elizabeth Chan
________________________________________________________________________________________________

From: Brandon Leung
To: HK PUI CHING ALUMNI <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 8:11 AM
Subject: Re: 致各位培正校友

本人梁竣傑，1989年級禮社。

本人支持黎藉冠學長之呼籲，反對楊國雄、葉賜添等人，於舊禮堂改建之大樓逾半教室，以培正之名，辦一間低水準的大專。

同時本人外甥現正就讀於培正小學，對於有其他非培正學生同在一棟教學大樓進出亦十分擔心。

望諸位校監、校董深思，作出明智抉擇，立即停止在培正教育大樓開辦培正專業學院，並作好善後工作。

梁竣傑啟
1989年禮社
培正同學會會員

________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Catherine Kung
To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 10:04 AM
Subject: RE: 致各位培正校友

本人支持”校友的呼聲”，反對設立培專。

龔啟玲（1980 穎社）
________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Kenneth Leung
To: “[email protected]”
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 10:05 AM
Subject: 回覆﹕ 致各位培正校友

致培正同學會，
本人支持同學會反對培正校監校董開辦專業書院私立大專院校及損害培正小學的一切行為舉動。

梁培堅
剛社1971
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Anthony Louie
To: “[email protected]”
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 10:29 AM
Subject: Fw: Fwd: 致各培正校友

Hello,

Your case is well stated. I concur with my classmate, Yam Wai Ling for this
urgent message. I agree with your objective and action,

Anthony Louie ( 1965 )
________________________________________________________________________________________________

From: 黃志宏, 鄭愛華
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 10:35 AM
Subject: 籌建專上副學士學院

致培正各老大哥,董事:

培正同學在海內,外的表現有目共睹. 声誉超卓. 近聞董事會計劃籌備專上學院.
因香港副學士找工作不容易. 故可能會办不下去.而學生質素也無法控制. 恐怕办不成,會影響”培正”校誉.
又對社會幫助不大.

我們建議此方案要評鑑清楚,才能進行下去. 謝謝.

旭社(1962年)
黃志宏, 鄭愛華敬上
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Karina K S Wong
To: Puiching Alumni <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 10:44 AM
Subject: URGENT

敬啟者，
本人為86年畢業（晶社）校友，得知培正欲辦副學士課程，深表遺憾。眼見坊間辦學團體紛紛辦副學士課程，而又有多少學子受惠？讀畢只餘下一身債務，又有多少個能靠此上大學呢？培正乃百年老校，作育英才，是教育界的榜樣，犯不著趁這熱鬧。還請母校三思。

謝垂注。

黃嘉倩 上
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Yeungdanny
To: “[email protected]”
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 7:32 PM
Subject: 支持 停止開辦培正專業学院

光社1959楊定渝 支持同學會
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Danny Kwok
To: 同學會Puiching <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 11:24 AM
Subject: 反對用培正之名辦大專

本人同意 會長 和 [校友的呼聲] 的論點, 堅決反對以培正名義辦專上學校

郭秀山1990年級騰社
培正同學會副會長

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

寄件者： leung s. y.
收件者： HK PUI CHING ALUMNI <[email protected]>
寄件日期： 2014/6/26 (週四) 5:16 PM
主旨： RE: 致各位培正校友

黎會長：

同意各位意見，然葉校長及楊前校監(現校董)於早前因得特區政府助建IT教學試點而撥鉅款設置大量教學電腦，以作推廣試點。後因要維護有關設施而予承接培訓學校IT技術員課程，因而葉、楊便因利乘便創辦培專，更承投葛師址欲大展拳腳辦一條龍培正學校。現騎虎勢成，欲罷不能！

竊以為今欲以浸聯會培正中小學校董會之力，去營辦駕馭大專，實力有所未逮。葉校長縱有志繼先賢黃啟明校長之遺志，然而此一時也，彼一時也，應審時度勢，停辦培專。各位學長之金石良言，培中、小學校董會應臨崖勒馬，停辦培專。

耑此奉陳，並候 時祺
1963年級真社梁崇榆敬啟
________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Addy Cheong
To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 4:16 PM
Subject:

致: 香港培正同學會黎藉冠會長
香港浸聯會校董會
香港培正中學小學校董會, 校監, 校長, 各地培正同學會, 校友

敬啓者:
本人章子惠(76年敏社)支持香港培正同學會發起反對培正專業書院, 佔用培正教育大樓八至十五層作為
開辦副學士等大專課程。
敬請有関校監校董校長, 順應大眾校友之見, 切勿好大喜功, 放下私利, 撤銷此案為盼。
此致
校安！

温哥華培正同學會前會長章子惠謹
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Peter Lee
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 5:41 PM
To: AlanTong
Subject: Re: 致各位培正校友
I fully agree with your insights.
李偉齡昇社
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Felix Lee
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 3:37 PM
Subject: 反对用培正之名办大专

致 : 培正同學會
本人 李信漢, 1960年 正社 反對用培正小學大樓辦大專. 請浸聯各人深思, 不要損害培正之名.
李信漢
________________________________________________________________________________________________

From: Paul Wu
To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 6:00 PM
Subject: 支持

本人胡汝源 Paul Wu 1959 光社 澳大利亞 墨爾本.
請加本人名字 支持同學會.
祝一切順利

Paul Wu
________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: SUNG JOSEPH
To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>;
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 2:29 PM
Subject: 反対開辦低水準之專院

敬啟者
本人係1962旭社校友
本人堅決反對開辦只能招到3名學生的專校

宋成銘
神經科醫師
精神科醫師
台北醫學大學兼任臨床教授
1942旭社
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Danny
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 11:29 PM
To: puiching.org
Subject: RE: 致各位培正校友

Dear Alan,
I support your opinion 100%. Please inform me what to do next.

Thank you
Yum koan 美國加州69昇社譚瑞欽
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
From: William Kou
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 4:46 AM
To: puiching.orgi
Subject: 有關培正大專書院

謝謝各位轉來有關「培正大專書院」的消息，才知這所「大專」學校用的是培正小學校
園內方建好的大樓中的8-15樓。

相信興建此大樓，許多的培正同學或以個人名字，或以級社名字（例，我社同學集資認
捐一班房，訂名昇社課室）捐款助建，為的是供培正小學、中學使用。如今該大樓的一
大部分卻不為培正中、小學而用，有違許多同學捐款本意，而參與比決策的人士亦無事
前照會香港培正同學總會（代表全球培正同學）及有關人士及級社，實在辜負了同學們
愛護母校的美意，願參與成立「培正大專書院」決策之諸公三思。

1969年級昇社同學
寇懷誠 上
__________________________________________________________________________________________________

From: Chan Tze Lock
To: ‘HK PUI CHING ALUMNI’ <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 3:46 PM
Subject: RE: 致各位培正校友

Dear Mr Siu,
Please add my name as a signee to the letter of appeal.
Sincerely yours,
Tze-Lock Chan(陳子樂) 1958銳社
CUHK Chemistry

From: Dr. C. Y. Wong
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 4:37 PM
Subject: 反對[培小]內設”培正書院

培正同學會黎會長大鑒:

近悉”浸會”欲於[培正小學]內開設”培正書院”以招收’副學士’生. 深感莫明其妙!!

昔日培正先賢創校之宗旨與目的, 如今安在? 以一牟利之”書院”並存於以[至善至正]為辦學宗旨之[培正小學]內, 何其諷刺與格格不相入! 港人皆知副學士之素質!!! 若因而影響[培正]得來不易之[百年校譽], 何以對艱苦創校之前賢? 何以對百年來為校爭光之[紅藍兒女]?

古語云: 人必自重而後人重之! 若有人財迷心竅, 自取其辱! 則凡我紅藍兒女須群起攻之! 以保我[培正]百年校譽於不倒! 秉為紅藍兒女之一, 我極力反對將”培正書院”置於[培小]內.

培正耀社(1965) 黃昭欽博士上

Dr. C. Y. Wong
Chief Executive Officer
The Academy of Management Consultancy
Tel. 2573 4992
Mobile: 6303 9037
Website: www.academy-mc.org
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Paul Yu
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 11:11 AM
To: ‘Alan Tong’
Subject: RE: 致各位培正校友

Dear Alan,

I fully support the motion proposed by the named Alumnus on the objection to establish a College of “Sub-degree programme” at the current Pui Ching campus since I also had a terrible experience of a similar programme with the Tung Wah College which was established about 10 years ago. This kind of programme is a total failure and became a financial burden to the Board of Directors of The Tung Wah Group of Hospitals since then.

Regards,
Paul Yu余嘯天(1969昇社)
_________________________________________________________________________________________________

From: Kai Ching Wat
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 7:11 PM
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Fwd: 致各位培正校友

香港培正同學會

同意十三位學者校友有關在培正教育大樓開辦培正專業學院意見

1965耀社屈啟正
__________________________________________________________________________________________________

From: MC Yau
To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: 培正辦副學士課程

本人同意同學會反對培正專業書院借用培正教育大樓辦副學士課程．
1955 年級忠社 丘銘筑
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Tuen Tony Kwok
To: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2014 2:14 AM
Subject:

1959年光社郭端反對開辦培正專業書院
郭端
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: 尹超然
To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 10:28 PM
Subject: 支持培正同學會

致培正同學會 黎會長，

本人乃八九禮社尹超然同學， 本人贊同培正同學會於開辦私立大專院校一事之立場。
________________________________________________________________________________________________

From: albert chan
To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 8:33 PM
Subject: 反對以培正之名辦大專

本人陳端勵,1959年級光社. 認為以培正之名辦大專,
實實在在無此需要. 理由是:–
1.沒具明確辦學目標和方向.
2.沒有足夠領導人,乏財力,缺良師以支撑長遠發展.
3.如今收生人數和現存學位在比例上呈可悲的比例.
社教界早巳投不信任一票.
強行辦學無幸福!!
__________________________________________________________________________________________________

From: chic_ms
To: HK PUI CHING ALUMNI <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2014 2:26 AM
Subject: RE: 致各培正校友

本人1973勤社吳欽禮支持同學會及熱心愛母校校友，反對校董及浸联會處理培專及培正大樓議案。
浸联支持辨工專，用浸联名義或浸大名下的資源，不要敗壊培正名及雀巢鸠佔！
________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: David
To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2014 2:14 AM
Subject: 本人赞成撤销香港培正專業學院佔用大楼招生開辩副学士等課程
本人赞成撤销香港培正專業學院佔用大楼招生開辩副学士等課程

麥建成
1965耀社
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Edward Leung
To: HK PUI CHING ALUMNI <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2014 1:26 AM
Subject: Re: 致各培正校友

Hello,
I strongly object turning the new building for higher education. Please return the control to Pui Ching Primary School.
梁欣恩(1976敏)
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: chan drake
To: [email protected]
Subject: 反對成立培正學院

致培正，
本人極力反對成立培正學院。
陳德立禮社
_________________________________________________________________________________________________

From: Shuet lee
Date: 2014-06-27 21:05 GMT+08:00
Subject: 培正小學禮堂樓意見書 , 請轉達雷禮和或有關人仕
To: [email protected]
首先, 本人絕對支持雷禮和及各學長的動議書. 強烈反對培正大專無償地使用培正小學的資源. 培正大專這個行為正為”慷他人之概”的不負責仼心態作最淋漓的寫照. 而更無理的是要強將物主的名牌除去.

我不清楚禮堂的業權屬誰. 如果屬於浸聯, 為何會通過這個將小學資源蠶食淨盡的方案？ 而培正大專的辦學人不作正途的“盈虧自負” 計劃,卻去佔別人的便宜, 更是自私自利. 敬請培正大專主辧人自重, 不要辜負在培正所受的教育, 有本事就自食其力. 小學大樓是校友為了小學發展而捐助的. 如要借用, 請簽上雙方都同意的合約并且努力履行全部條欵.

這是本人以愛䕶母校立塲的意見, 但相信大部分校友都有同感, 畢竟我們都是在同一學校共渡學習的歲月. 對母校的愛䕶是一樣的.

1968 年仁社李雪珍
_________________________________________________________________________________________________

From: Ian Tsang
To: “[email protected]
Sent: 2014-06-28
Subject: Re: 培正辦副學士課程

本人甚同意林錫衡同學的意見。請把我的名字加入反對人士之列。
忠社曾廣營
Clinical Professor Emeritus
Faculty of medicine
University of British Columbia
Canada
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Fong Sin
To: HK PUI CHING ALUMNI <[email protected]>
Sent:
Subject: Re: 致各位培正校友

黎藉冠會長
You have my support.
Regards,
Fong冼重芳學社

From: Elizabeth T S Chan Houang
Date: June 26, 2014 at 7:41:55 PM EDT
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: 致各位培正校友

我支持你們的呼聲信。

黃亭秀（1962旭社）CUHK MEDlCINE
Elizabeth Chan
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Sammy Lam
To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>
Sent: 2014-06-28
Subject: strongly against using Pui Ching funding support pui ching academy

This is Wai Kit Lam, class of 73. I have learned that certain 校監、校董 manipulate Pui Ching resource to support a so called Pui Ching Academy, an independent opeartion outside Pui Ching operation. As a long time Pui Ching alumni, I would like to voice my opposition to any attempt using Pui Ching resource (funding or facility) for Pui Ching Academy purpose. The school board’s duty is guiding school to fulfil the mission, providing excellent elementary education, not milking the school to certain slow death. Pui Ching Academy has no place in Pui Ching future and shall not be supported. I am 100% behind 黎會長 acting to protect our beloved school from the wicked board.
Wai Kit Lam 林懷傑

From: Sammy Lam
To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 12:09 AM
Subject: petition
pls organize a petition on change.org to allow alumni to show supports.
Wai Kit Lam 林懷傑1973
No man ever steps into the same river twice, for it’s not the same river and he’s not the same man. -Heraclitus of Ephesus (535-475BC)
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Chi Ming Law
To: “[email protected]”
Subject: 支持同學會的呼籲

我反對培專的成立.
1977傑社
羅志明敬上
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Yam Leung <
To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2014 10:09 PM
Subject: 啇專借用培正教育大褛

我支持反對這項提議

梁䕃潮 Yam C Leung. 1952 偉社
__________________________________________________________________________
寄件者： RONALD KWOK
收件者： HK PUI CHING ALUMNI <[email protected]>
寄件日期： 2014/6/27 (週五) 10:19 AM
主旨： Re: 致各位培正校友

DEAR CHAIRMAN LAI
AGREE WITH KEEP IN TOUCH THS
RONALD KWOK—–LEFT—-
1957 SUPPOSE 1965GM
NEW CREATIVE GLOBAL RESOURCES HK
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
From: D Wong
To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: 致各培正校友

Dear Board of Directors of Pui Ching:
Please accept my input that I do not support the contemplated 培正專業書院 for the following reasons:
1) It is vitally important to focus on cultivating/educating the K to 12 students and to continue to excel in maintaining and improving our unblemished and hard earned academic successes for the past century+;

2) It is my recommendation that Pui Ching to continue to “do a few things” exceptionally well, vs. seeking for expansion into a crowded arena of post secondary education.

Respectfully,
Danny Wong T.Y. ( 1963 ) 汪大勇
________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Shak Hai Wong <
To: “[email protected]” <
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 6:05 AM
Subject: Re: 2014 July Monthly Meeting

My name is WONG SHAK HAI黃錫禧, Zhengshe正社 1960. I strongly support the Pui Ching Alumni Association to request the Pui Ching College to stop using the campus of Pui Ching Primary School without the consent of all Pui Ching Alumni and without paying the due fee.

Wong Shak Hai黃錫禧
__________________________________________________________________________________
From: Andrew Chan
To: HongKong PCAA <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2014 10:04 AM
Subject: Re: 培正辦副學士課程

本人也同意林錫衡學長的意見. 不知培正領導層有否向大家公開决意開辨此培正專業書院的理据, 為何必要此時此地, 條件情勢不利的情况卞, 仍要征用培正小學校地方開辦專業書院? 如為要 继承黃啓明故校長辦大學遺願, 為何不考慮將原在培正校園開創的浸會大學復改名為”培正大學”? 如為要以愛心给一些未够條件入一般大學者机会進修, 那為何不於浸會大學或其眾多院校開設”浸會專業書院”? 愚見失敬之處, 祈請恕諒.

陳秉麟1961 善社於墨爾本
____________________________________________________________________________________
2014年級雋社聯署信函

培正中學校監、校董:
雋社同學謹以培正學生之至誠，反對培正教大樓開辦培正專業書院，懇請諸位三思。
以下為2014年級雋社同學之聯署。
伍康文、朱朗然、余昀靜、吳旻欣、李穎心、姚天朗、莫駿然、陳銳庭、彭芷晴、謝卓恒、
黃晧俊、楊子朗、翟朗欣、趙廷軒、劉芷謙、潘力行、鄭晉宏、鄭鈞澤、賴映彤、嚴燕婷

敬祝教安
培正中學雋社敬啟
2014年6月28日
__________________________________________________________________________________

From: MC Yau <
To: HK PUI CHING ALUMNI <[email protected]>
Cc: Sie Han Lam <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2014 11:51 AM
Subject: Re: 培正辦副學士課程

Dear Michael Lai，
Your effort is appreciated。
Best wishes，
MC Yau 1955 年級 忠社丘銘筑
__________________________________________________________________________________
From: Sylvia Cheung >
To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2014 11:57 AM
Subject: 反對用培正之名辦大專

本人張景燊(1952偉社)鼎力支持各校友”一致反對用培正之名辦大專”

美國德州校友張景燊
二零一四年六月卄七日
________________________________________________________________________________________________

From: Jonathan Wong <
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2014 2:15 PM
Subject: Pui Ching resources misused

敬啓者：
本人反対个人或机構進一步謀取培正小学資源用於所謂《培 正大專》的營運。順祝
萭事如意！
黄漢強謹啓（仁社，1968）
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Ching-Lung Tin <
To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2014 5:34 PM
Subject:

Dear Sir,
I, Tin ching Lung, class of 1960, do suuport the Alumni’s opinion.
Please count my vote !
Tin Ching Lung田正龍
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
寄件者： Wilma Liu
收件者： HK PUI CHING ALUMNI <[email protected]>
寄件日期： 2014/6/27 (週五) 4:35 PM
主旨： 認同培正大樓不該辦副學士課程方案 .Re: 致各位培正校友

各位紅藍同學 :

獲悉由培正校友資助，培正小學獨力興建的培正教育大樓已經落成，十分欣慰。
不幸的是培正專業書院竟然打算佔用其中第8至15層，以開辦一些副學士等課程，
全球培正人深感憂慮，其原因有三 :

(1) 由於香港已經有8所UGC-funded大學，另有8所自負盈虧大學(其中七所私立大學，
一所公開大學) ，19所專上院校，合共35所大學及專上學院，它們大都開設有副
學士課程，由於供求失衡，條件較差的如培專書院，實難招收足夠的自費學生。
下表列出各校招生的結果。培正專業書院收生情況，實在不忍卒睹，入讀率只
有2%，這對培正嘉名，簡直是個羞辱。

(2) 2013年一些董事曾經企圖背著培正，將新培正教育大樓按予香港政府，
以取得1.8億圓貸款經營培專。由於全球培正校友反對而作罷。現在開辦培專書院，
不知有否通過可行性研究, 有否周詳的財務預算計劃( Financial Budget Plan) 。
萬一收支不平衡，出現赤字，難保不會拖著培小落水。如資不抵債而倒閉關門，
將有負社會及家長學生的期望。

(3) 培正是本港之名校，校風名列前茅 。 培專招收低成績學生 (14分或10分
下) ，學生來自四方八面，良莠不齊，同在一棟教學大樓進出，對培 幼
培小學生及家長，很有負面影嚮。將來是否會嚇走一部份家長和學
生，實難預料。
綜上所述，我們認為，花大力氣辦一所連培正子弟都不屑入讀的學院，有違培正
先賢的宗旨。以目前香港教育環境，無政府資助而自資辦大專，就算有樹仁鍾期榮、
胡鴻烈伉儷的毅力和抱負，也絕對難有成效。謹以校友之至誠，望諸位校監、校董
深思，作出明智抉擇，立即停止在培正教育大樓開辦培正專業學院，並作好善後工
作。
多謝大家關心母校事工！
柳慧敏(1986晶)
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Po Lin Han <
To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 6:05 AM
Subject: Re: URGENT REQUEST from HKPCAA

My name is Po Lin Young 楊波玲class 1960
I would like to show my support.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________

From: muddy water <
To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 7:59 AM
Subject:
本人支持鍾景輝、廖約克、丘成桐…..等學長之呼籲，反對楊國雄、葉賜添等人，於舊禮堂改建之大樓逾半教室，以培正之名，辦一間低水準，乏人申請入讀的大專。
高子愷1968仁
___________________________________________________________________________

From: harold soo
To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>; ”
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2014 12:50 PM
Subject:

Los Angeles, CA June 27, 2014
Dear Pui Ching Alumni:
I am humbled to say I graduated from Pui Ching in 1959 with the lowest possible ranking by then principals Ho and Gee. I was deemed a trouble maker. To-day I still remember fondly the Red/Blue spirit and our R/B inbreed teachers.
Now, I have two suggestion for you in our consideration of this recent farce. I notice there are lots of alumni from all kinds of background, but there is a scarcity of response from the business and commerce side. Therefore I like to pose the following questions and I have no use for politeness:
1. Why is Mr. 楊國雄 and his cohorts insist on pushing for this white elephant project? If it is for the advancement of the HK Baptist Church to convert more HK youth? If so, I think our argument is basically different interpretations of Pui Ching’s mission. No harm done and keep on arguing. While with only 3 students admission on record, something doesn’t seem right to open a 2 year professional school, with all the financial risks in uncharted water and no interested applicants, no prestige, no income. Puzzling!
Now, as a businessman, I can understand why. Now, think of all the furnishings, furniture, computers, networks, lab equipment, free rent… there is HUGH profit and ownership involved, especially it is using other people’s money to build it. Any good businessman will jump at the first chance.
2. Why the HK Baptist Council allows such a farce? Are these old boys live in a different, spiritual world? Or they think like our communist countrymen: ( Red first before Learning). Don’t they realize that lots of PC alumnus were baptized while in PC. Couldn’t they find someone with more academic prowess than someone from some 5th rate seminary? I guess you know the answer.
Thank you for your kind attention. I am
Harold Soo Ph.D. (Princeton)
Oil and Gas Consultant
Class of 1959 D38, Soo Sui Wing
____________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mable Sun <
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 9:18 AM
Subject: Re: URGENT REQUEST from HKPCAA

My name is Mable Kwong Sun, class of 1960
I support the Pui Ching Alumni Association.
鄺碧美1960正社
__________________________________________________________________________
From: CF/Annie Pang <
To: “[email protected]” Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 11:03 AM
Subject: 回覆︰ URGENT REQUEST from HKPCAA

本人彭澤蕃(1960 正社)完全支持香港培正同學會發表在〝校友的呼
聲〞中之理據。並堅决反對培正專業書院佔用其中第8至15層，在培正教育大樓開辦培正專業學院。
彭澤蕃(1960 正社)
_________________________________________________________________________________________
From: ” Pauline Tam
To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 11:08 AM
Subject: 反對培正專業學院之成立
本人絕對反對培正專業學院之成立並使用新建的大樓. Please don’t ruin Pui-Ching’s reputation.
Thank you.
Pauline Tam (鍾寳蓮 1966 皓社）_______________________________________________________________________________________
From: Kam Fung <
To: Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 12:35 PM
Subject: 回覆︰ URGENT REQUEST from HKPCAA

本人李錦池,1960 正社.
完全支持香港培正同學會.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
From: bill wang <
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 12:38 PM
Subject: Fwd: 回覆︰ URGENT REQUEST from HKPCAA

I totally support the stands as outlined in the HKPCAA and 校 友 的 呼 聲 letters (emails as received) both dated 26 June, 2014 as attached herewith.
William Wang (王旦华) 1961 善社
__________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Sammy Lam
To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 12:41 PM
Subject: 反對培正資源用於大專，要求校董交代

> 黎同學會會長,
> 自從Facebook 得知培正大專事，我們七三年勤社中六光班舊生都覺得培正校董會並不以培正利益為念，反有倒行逆施之舉。培正大專，與培正中小學教育理念毫無銜接關係。一學年收三名學生，是無市場需求結果。校董會利用培正職獾，胡作胡為，置培正中小前途不顧，浪費資源。誠有失職之舉。如浸會有志發展大專，大可用浸會資源，何必強迫培正上馬？下列光班同學一致支持黎會長爭取培正應有權益。希望浸聯會及其指派校董不要把培正先賢多年經營根業毀於一旦。
特此敬告。

勤社中六光舊生-林懷傑，吴欽禮，羅浩源，楊傳榮，羅錫強，劉逸楨，陳婉華，梁佩德，梁雲，王志麟，姜熾昌，溫永明，馬明心, 梁永光 敬上
From: Bob Yu
To: HK PUI CHING ALUMNI <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 3:22 PM
Subject: 培正專業書院招生開辦副學士等課程

President Michael Lai,
Hong Kong Pui Ching Alumni Association Ltd
本人反對 培正專業書院正準備在新落成的培正教育大樓第八層至十五層，招生開辦
副學士等課程
邱鍾輝Yau, Chung Fai 1973
________________________________________________________________________________________
From: “蘇寶禮
To: HK PUI CHING ALUMNI <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 7:27 PM
Subject: Re: 致各位培正校友

本人支持香港培正同學縂會，反對培正校監及校董等人擬佔用培正小學校舍以主辦「培專」一事。
蘇寶禮1964 協社
________________________________________________________________________________________

From: sham chi
To: Pui Ching Alumni <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 9:48 PM
Subject: RE: 致各培正校友

本人支持同學會此決定
1971 剛社 岑志仁
___________________________________________________________________________

From: Kwok Hui
To: HK PUI CHING ALUMNI [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 5:51 AM
Subject: Re: 致各位培正校友
黎會長鈞鑒，
頃接六月卄六日來函，呼籲紅藍兒女支持會長進行撤銷在培正教育大樓開辦大專一事。
經通知全體美南（德州）培正同學後，本人及所有支持同學（名單如下, 及附件）願以至誠支持黎會長這項任重道遠之方案。
特此敬告，並頌近安！

美南（德州）培正同學會會長
許國華（1969 昇社）

林炳才 1939 鵬 李澤洲 1957 輝 梁兆明 1969 昇
馬紹坤 1939 鵬 賀振遠 1958 銳 許國華 1969 昇
黃煜生 1939 鵬 馮志寧 1958 銳 黃婉怡 1969 昇
張樂天 1941 磐 錢信行 1958 銳 羅大愚 1969 昇
周占棠 1942 斌 郭子賢 1959 光 關文爚 1969 昇
黃家駋 1942 斌 李國富 1960 正 蘇冠雲 1969 昇
Lee, Sik Ben 1945 毅 何 猛 1962 旭 朱惋儀 1970 謙
何 清 1945 毅 陳鑑庭 1962 旭 陳健生 1970 謙
李克焜 1945 毅 朱婉蘭 1963 真 陳紹綸 1970 謙
鄧錫全 1947 虹 吳盛俸 1963 真 王炎華 1971 剛
陳汝棠 1950 弘 李紹鏗 1963 真 伍兆嫦 1971 剛
李靈新 1951 明 姚秀萍 1963 真 梁柏力 1971 剛
賴景博 1951 明 胡斑比 1963 真 陳健兒 1971 剛
林春榮 1952 偉 甄坤荔 1963 真 陳綺華 1971 剛
林鴻模 1952 偉 梁柏德 1964 協 陳興權 1971 剛
張景燊 1952 偉 劉應德 1964 協 黃志凱 1971 剛
陳世勳 1952 偉 蘇寶禮 1964 協 袁紹華 1972 賢
高偉利 1953 誠 王浩華 1965 耀 李國俊 1973 勤
陳孝廉 1953 誠 阮壽彭 1965 耀 李嘉民 1973 勤
劉國堅 1953 誠 趙 華 1965 耀 林懷傑 1973 勤
盧觀鎬 1953 誠 周惠儀 1966 皓 何麗寧 1974 基
唐介明 1954 匡 黃威信 1966 皓 林永健 1974 基
張惇佑 1954 匡 方伯舜 1967 恆 陳耀德 1974 基
何永康 1955 忠 陳淑熙 1967 恆 羅達威 1974 基
張輝耀 1955 忠 王瑞冰 1968 仁 伍維民 1981 勁
陳文彬 1955 忠 溫綺蓮 1968 仁 關少佳 1987 德
溫威廉 1955 忠 關德沛 1968 仁 蔣浩天 1992 義
李梅麗 1956 瑩 丁琪珊 1969 昇 陳正衡 2007 驁
胡博文 1956 瑩 何玉英 1969 昇 張卓頎 2008 希
陳佐冶 1956 瑩 吳淼鑫 1969 昇 詹秀華 1976m 敏
馮奇彬 1956 瑩 李志明 1969 昇 戴家強 1976m 敏
黃文康 1956 瑩 曹應泉 1969 昇 蘇永權 1976m 敏

From: Dennis Su
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 12:56 PM
Subject: Re: FW: URGENT REQUEST from HKPCAA

It’s comforting to see our 1960 classmates stepping up to support the PCAA on the potential lost of control of part of Pui Ching campus in Ho Man Tin.
Just like to throw in my two cents at this critical moment. When PC announced to replace the decades old auditorium to build a multistory education building, it has been known that part of the upper levels will be used for some kind of 専上学院。 We all go for that idea, even scandal popped up one after another about that building.
This is the latest “emergency” that Pui Ching is facing, partly due to the failure of filling up those classrooms as some newspapers reported on the lack of interest to enroll in that kind of institutions. Partly due to widening gap between Pui Ching and the HK Baptist Mission, and the dollar signs are bigger than tradition and branding in the heads of those in power.
I suggest that when we vote to support the PC Alumni Association, we also ask the PCAA to follow up with an action plan. I am too old to see so many protests with the right cause went nowhere due to the lack of what’s next ? Plan.
Dennis

From: Dennis Su < To: "[email protected]"
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 1:55 PM
Subject: 培正教学大楼

Hello Pui Ching Alumni Association 学長，
As a 1960 正社 alumni, I am sending you my supports to oppose the operation of a “wild chicken 上専“ in the recently completed high rise building where our beloved auditorium used to stand.
Your appeal letter mentioned the potential danger of having such operation within the Pui Ching campus is alarming. Please do whatever is wise, legal, and respect to the 至善至正 core value of Pui Ching to resolve this crisis.
Thank you for your efforts.
徐子敬 Dennis Su

From: Yan Kai
To: Dennis Su
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 9:23 PM
Subject: Re: [MAY BE SPAM] Re: FW: URGENT REQUEST from HKPCAA

子敬給我們上了一堂歷史的課，很好！當日改建計劃,既然預留若干層數作為專上教育之用，然則在計畫發展方面，校友會是否以前有機會參與？若是没有，今後應該積極參與。培正校友中的教育圈中人才，俯拾皆是，當能擬出一個周詳計劃。
不錯，當下可能不是適當時機。以後又如何？
解仁的一份野人獻曝
___________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Adrian Ip < To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 11:13 PM Subject: 反對用培正之名辦大專 本人支持 “校友的呼聲” , 堅决反對設立培專 Ip Adrian 葉熙淳 2012 卓社 __________________________________________________________________________________________ From: Hanson Cheng Date: June 29, 2014 at 12:21:21 PM EDT To: Pui Ching Subject: Re: 致各位培正校友 黎會長， 多謝來訊. 本社將回應支持. 我想大多數同學都感覺奇怪此事如何能夠發生. 箇中原委, 發展至今之來龍去脈, 可否請會長作些說明卑同學, 尤其海外同學多了解一些此事之實際情況. 祝近安. 程慶生 (1962 旭社) 於多倫多 _________________________________________________________________________________ From: Juliana Wong To: HK PUI CHING ALUMNI
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 1:01 AM
Subject: Re: 回覆︰ URGENT REQUEST from HKPCAA
李淑蓮 Juliana Wong.1960 年正社
完全支持香港培正同學會
_______________________________________________________________________________________

From: Tin Ho Chiu < To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 2:54 AM Subject: Re: 致各培正校友 My name is Tin Ho Chiu an alumnus of the class of 1960 and like to let you know that I support the view of the Alumni Association's position. Thank you! Tin Ho Chiu 徐天河正社 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ From: Sammy Chi Leung Chan To: HK PUI CHING ALUMNI
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 3:20 AM
Subject: Re: 致各位培正校友

Dear president Lai:

My name is Sammy Chi Leung Chan (from Boston). I selected to vote “NO” to this matter!
_______________________________________________________________________________________
From: Peter Au Jok Son < To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 6:10 AM Subject: 培專佔校 各位學長： 本人完全支持香港培正同學會發表在「校友的呼聲」中之理據，並堅決反對培正專業書院佔用培正教育大樓其中第8至15層開辦培正專業學院。 假上主之名而行惡，如何能領導信眾侍主愛人？嗚呼，可以休矣。 __________________________________________________________________________________________ From: Donald D.M. Tong To: "[email protected]"
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 8:40 AM
Subject: 贊成校友的呼聲

本人唐冬明（Donald D.M. Tong）（1961善社) 贊成校友的呼聲决議—停止在培正教育大樓開辦培正專業學院。
唐冬明謹

From: Wilson Lo
To: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 1:23 PM
Subject: 反對培正專業書院佔用培正小學教育大樓

本人反對培正專業書院佔用培正小學教育大樓
1988年 曦社，盧景聰

From: Yahoo! Mail
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 10:44 PM
Subject: HGC – Pui Ching

Dear Sir / Madam,

I have read the articles related to the above-captioned subject matter. I do understand the concerns that have brought to the HK Pui Ching Alumni Association. I believe that the concerns are legitimate. The broad of trustees may want to make a further assess and evaluate the financial planing. A project, such as HGC should be sounded for the purpose of goals and objectives.
Thanks.

Michael K Cheung (張官帝 / 1972 賢社）
Fiscal Director
Tennessee Department of Human Services, Child Support Fiscal Services – Retired
　F39 (1959光社)
2010-2013年在培正小學課外活動口琴組任義務導師
_______________________________________________________________________________________
From: Julie Chan
To: Puiching Alumni
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 8:04 AM
Subject: Junior college

To Hong Kong Pui Ching Alumni Association,

I support the viewpoint of the 13 Alumni and also the viewpoint of President Lai of HKPCAA. I like to ask the Dean of School and the Board of Director of Pui Ching Primary School to rescind the decision of leasing to the Junior college the upper floors of the New building of Pui Ching Primary School. Such operation is not in the best interest of the Pui Ching Primary School.

Sincerely,

Julie Chan Hsieh陳文珠
Class of 1964
__________________________________________________________________________________
From: Chan Lam
To: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 9:02 AM
Subject: Do not allow the new college to use the name of Pui Ching and the use of any property of the Pui Ching School

My name is Chan F Lam (林鎮藩) Ph.D, Class of 1961 and Professor Emeritus, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.. I strongly support the Pui Ching Alumni Association to request the Pui Ching College to stop using the campus of Pui Ching School. The use of any part of the new 15 story building by people not part of Pui Ching School should not be allowed. The principal of Pui Ching Primary School should not be allowed to give a key to the new building to the new college. The new college should not be allowed to use Pui Ching as part of its name.

Do not forget Pui Ching Alumni all over the world has contributed greatly to the funding for the construction of the new 15 story building. It would be difficult to raise any funds from Pui Ching Alumni in the future if the new college is allowed to use any part of the new building.

Sincerely your,
Chan F Lam, Ph.D.
林鎮藩

From: Wing Society Pui Ching Middle School
To: “[email protected]”
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 11:14 AM
Subject: RE: 致各位培正校友

本人支持＂校友的呼聲＂，堅決反對設立培專。

葉家玉（1980穎社）

From:禮社聯署
To: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 10:04 AM
Subject: 為培正大專學院一事建議安排諮詢會

致黎藉冠學長，
較早前收到黎學長關於以培正教育大樓開辦培正大專學院一事，身為紅藍兒女，對此事抱以萬二分的關注及關心，與禮社銀禧嘉冕委員會商討後，部份同學為反對之聲，亦有部份想更清楚瞭解此事，有鑒此事對培正將來的聲譽影响尤甚，故此，建議學長邀請有關辦理培正大專學院的單位及專員，舉辦諮詢大會，以分析培正大專學院之教學目標及對培正的長遠建樹何在，此舉除了給予培正大專學院的承辦單位有發聲機會，亦可令一眾對此事關心及擔心的紅藍兒女瞭解更多，以建立培正長遠之聲譽及教育利益為依歸！

此致
1989年禮社級社代表方靜嫻
聯署禮社銀禧加冕委員會
吳榮卓、梁耀輝、杜惠苓、陳光明、梁竣傑、李淑賢、陳綺明、陳安兒、鄭恩娜、唐迎、朱啟華、陸効民、鄧昕 、何迪希、張之仁、黎鎮豪、吳嘉文、陳穎之、李浩賢、陳德立，劉偉豪、衞卓麟 上

寄件者： Sam Chan < 收件者： HK PUI CHING ALUMNI
寄件日期： 2014/6/30 (週一) 1:21 AM
主旨： RE: 致各位培正校友

Hi,
Thanks for keeping me of the process.
Personally, I am strong against the idea to have such low standard
college to be built and associated to our school name.

Best regards.
Chan Sum Chun 陳森春(1965 class)
__________________________________________________________________________
From: slsham
To: HK PUI CHING ALUMNI
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 11:04 PM
Subject: Re: 致各培正校友
我支持培正同學會，培正不可以開二流大專，或任何大專。
1967恆社 利秀衡
_________________________________________________________________________________

From: Rupert Mok
To: HK PUI CHING ALUMNI
Cc: “[email protected]”
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 1:54 PM
Subject: Re: 致各位培正校友

前敏社社長 莫國章 支持培正同學會 反對培正專業書院佔用其中第8至15層開辦副學士等課程等等
並呼龥各级社支持同學會及小學張廣德校長辦好及擴展培正小學.

莫國章敏社

From: Pak Chun Patrick Tang
To: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 9:37 AM
Subject: 聲援反對香港培正專業書院以新落成大樓開辦副學士

致香港培正同學會 黎藉冠會長
我們為驁社(2007)及希社(2008)之校友，是次來函聲援會長，反對香港培正專業書院再將新落成大樓第八至十五層裝修以開辦副學士一事。若有其他需要我們的地方，請會長明示。抱歉現時確確實實表明反對之校友並不多，望仍能多少促成此事。另感激會長及一眾學長一直為母校勞心勞力！
2007 驁社
Pak Chun Patrick Tang (鄧柏駿) (聯絡人)
City University of Hong Kong, Psychology
ManWai Alessandro Chan(陳文瑋)
Illinois Institution of Technology MS of Bio
Melissa Joanne Leong (梁頌恩)
Simon Fraser University, Criminology
Chow Ho Ting (周浩庭)
CUHK, Clinical Psychology
Ho Sai Tung (何世東)
University of York, Forensic Psychology
Barbara Ka Yan Pau (鮑家欣)
University of Hong Kong, Clinical Psychology
Wong Ho Man(黃昊文)
University of Plymouth, Environmental science
So Chun Kit (蘇俊傑)
POLYU, Food safety and technology
Liu Tsz Yan (廖紫殷)
Open University, Nursing
2008 希社
Yeung Wai Lok Wesley (楊偉樂)
中學老師
HY Yeung (楊凱儀)
MBBS (HKU)
Or Chik Nam Timothy
HKBU, Chemistry (environmental studies)

From: Fred Lo
To: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 12:09 PM
Subject: Oppose to move

Hi Mr. Michael Lai,

I support you in voting to oppose this move.

Best Regards,
Fred Yun Fat Lo盧潤發
(Year of 66)
From: “Pang, Aaron Kwok Chu”
To: “[email protected]”
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 2:02 PM
Subject: 反對用培正之名辦大專

本人彭國柱，1991年級勇社

本人支持鍾景輝、廖約克、丘成桐…..等學長之呼籲和提議，立刻停止繼續撥款支持該楊葉主理之大專，
並追收前欠的建築費及代墊钜款。
___________________________________________________________________________________

From: Philip Tyau < Subject: 培正辦副學士課程 To: PCA - HK Pui Ching Alumni Asso [email protected] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 3:20 PM 想浸联會創辦浸會大學多年仍要拱手送予香港政府(本人曾任職於浸會大學達十五年, 對其中過程亦有參予及多所了解)成為一所公立大學, 足見大專教育經營不易;今日基於何種「新資源或新理由」有能力建立一所私立基督教專上學院實令人懷疑, 在未清楚有關細節前實不宜「借出」校舍予培正專業書院使。 据網上資料所示,培正專業書院(詳見於www.pca.edu/hk)將於7月14-19曰於培正道20號招生, 8月8-15日次輪招生, 開學禮(侍定)9月13日於培正道20號舉行。由於時間緊逼,宜盡早發出本會立場聲明, 建議透過網上傳閱方式通過”立場書”並公告本會全體會員、培正同學總會、各地校友會、浸聯會教育部、培正校蕫會、培正專業書院院蕫會及顧問委員會。 刁正1976敏社 ___________________________________________________________________________________ From: HO MING CHEONG < To: HK PUI CHING ALUMNI
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 4:45 PM
Subject: Re: 致各位培正校友

My name is HO Ming Cheong, 何銘昌 Zhengshe正社 1960. I strongly support the Pui Ching Alumni Association to request the Pui Ching College to stop using the campus of Pui Ching Primary School .

From: Marisa Ming
To: [email protected];
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 3:40 PM
Subject: I strongly support HK P.C Alumni Association’s position

Dear Mr. Lai:
Having reviewed the published appeal of the thirteen illustrious PC alumni and official data from the HK Department of Education confirming the sub-standard PC College having enrolled only three students, resulting in a shameful 98% vacancies in the current academic year, I have no doubt what, profit or education, really motivated the “P C College”s recent forceful control of parts of the Pui Ching primary school’s building without paying rent.
I and husband, Vem Chuang are graduates of Pui Ching Middle Schools class of 1960. We are Pui Ching alumni active in the San Francisco Bay Area, California, USA. I urge the parties apply whatever legal and peaceful means to return the building to its rightful landlord.
May the good side prevail!
Very truly yours,

Marisa Chuang-Yuen Ming
Zhengshe-Class of 1960
Berkeley, California
___________________________________________________________________________________
From: chok ho Cheng 鄭作豪社代表< To: "[email protected]"
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 4:04 PM
Subject:

香港培正同學會黎會長: 有關於26/6/2014 同學會發出通知書

本社大多數社友同意反對校董會所作所為.
1949年級-堅社 同仁

From: 鄧文正
To: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 5:21 PM
Subject: hi,,,

支持黎會長的建議。
反對辦培正大專。

皓社鄧文正

From: Kelvin Chu < To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 5:51 PM Subject: 不贊成培正開辦副學土課程 致培正同學會， 我本人不贊成培正開辦副學土課程。 朱國偉（1967年恒社） From: lodavid < To: "[email protected]"
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 6:25 PM
Subject: 夲人仁社1968 盧永雄

本人盧永雄1968仁社極力反對開辦培正大專書院及用新建小學大樓之任何層數作為大培正大專院舍。此致

寄件者： “Tse, Edmund-SW” < 收件者： HK PUI CHING ALUMNI
寄件日期： 2014/6/30 (週一) 5:50 PM
主旨： RE: 致各位培正校友

Dear President Lai,

Please add my name to support your appeal. Thanks.

Regards,

EDMUND TSE (謝仕榮)
瑩社 (1956)
HKU Mathematics (1960)
Honorary Doctorate of Social Science (2002)

From: douglas chan < To: "[email protected]"
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 7:27 PM
Subject: 反對用培正之名辦大專

黎會長,
請繼續游說有關校監、校董，停辦培專.

陳令偉1966 皓社
__________________________________________________________________________________

From: Michelle < To: "[email protected]"
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 7:34 PM
Subject: 培正專業学院

培正專業学院，

本人反对設立培正專業学院

Alec T.S.Chan, 陳達煊（1959 光社）
Retired General Manager,Air Transportation Engineering
1-647-887-6170
__________________________________________________________________________________
From: Stephanie Li < To: "[email protected]"
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 4:43 PM
Subject: 反対開辦培正專業書院

本人反對開辦培正專業書院

校友 李淑文（1965）

From: Mg Chi < To: "[email protected]" < Sent: Tuesday, July 1, 2014 12:25 AM Subject: 轉寄︰ 致各位培正校友 本人支持鍾景輝、廖約克、丘成桐…..等學長之呼籲，反對於舊禮堂改建之大樓逾半教室，以培正之名， 辦一間低水準，乏人申請入讀的大專。 齊鎂 1980 穎社 _______________________________________________________________________________ From: Ru Chen Date: June 30, 2014 at 10:34:42 AM EDT To: puiching.org Subject: Re: Fwd: 反對用培正之名辦大專 ，1950年級弘社。 我等支持鍾景輝、廖約克、丘成桐…..等學友之呼籲。 1950年弘社 ： 司徒荣植 陈汝燊 周幼威 于波士顿 同上 ________________________________________________________________________________________ From: Mokwingsheung < To: "[email protected]"
Sent: Tuesday, July 1, 2014 2:19 AM
Subject: 反對在培正小學校舍開辦大專

各位學長，

我林詠嫦，莫凌峰為1976年級敏社校友。透過電郵得知關於浸聯會和培正校董會欲在培正小學設立大專一事。我們同意同學會的立場，認為那樣的舉措極為不正確，既不符合培正辦學理想，也不符合商業經營利益。在此謹呼籲浸聯會和培正校董會慎重考慮，為培正作出正確選擇。

莫凌峰，林詠嫦 敏社校友
________________________________________________________________________________

From: Julia Wong 童怡菁
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, July 1, 2014 2:59 AM
Subject: 培正專業書院

本人同意香港培正同學會會長 黎藉冠及13位學者簽署函件 – 反對培正開辦專業書院副學士等課程。

一九六六年皓社 童苾芬
2014年6月30日
From: mancha Leung < To: "[email protected]"
Sent: Tuesday, July 1, 2014 4:10 AM
Subject:

I oppose the idea of opening up a post secondary school in the name of Pui Ching and inside Pui Ching’s school compound. If there is a provision in the alumni organization’s basic membership conducts to kick someone out, then I would suggest kicking out those members who made such proposal at the cost of Pui Ching Primary School and the reputation of Pui Ching. Thanks,

楊文燦Yeung Man Chan, class of 1966.
_________________________________________________________________________________

From: Patrick Ho
To: Puiching Alumni
Sent: Tuesday, July 1, 2014 5:05 AM
Subject: Pui Ching Academy

Dear Michael Lai, President and fellow board members of HKPCAAL:

I strongly agree with your position and oppose the establishment of Pui Ching Academy in the new education building of Pui Ching Primary School.

Class of 1966
何鎮英Patrick Chun-Ying Ho
___________________________________________________________________________________
From: Stanley Tse
To: HK PUI CHING ALUMNI
Sent: Tuesday, July 1, 2014 9:15 AM
Subject: Re: 致各位培正校友

My name is Stanley Shick-Hang Tse (謝錫恒), 香港培正1961善社.
I support president of Hong Kong Pui Ching Alumni Association.
___________________________________________________________________________________

From: Edward Chan
To: Puiching Alumni
Sent: Tuesday, July 1, 2014 4:09 PM
Subject: Fwd: 培正專業書院

本人陳德華（1966年級皓社）同意香港培正同學會會長黎藉冠和十三位學長簽署函件 – 反對培正開辦專業書院副學士等課程。

一九六六年皓社 陳德華
2014年6月30日
___________________________________________________________________________

From: Paulman Chan
To: “[email protected]”
Sent: Tuesday, July 1, 2014 10:05 AM
Subject: 培正辦副學士課程‏

Hi Pui Ching Alumni,
I am Chan Po Yu (1993 Hok House) I am not agree 培正辦副學士課程‏.
1. 副學士課程 is not popular and useful in HK‏
2.副學士課程‏ cannot earn profit (although PC post secondary say they are non-profit). As a result, can students pay for
the cost of instructors and staff plus other expenses?
3. what happen if 培正辦副學士課程‏ and lose money? I heard that the building is used for loan money.
4. The new building is for PCMS and PCPS, I believe, most donators would want building and money goes to PCMS and
PSPS not PC post secondary. Thus, this will not fair to donators.
5. There is no urgent need for HK have one more post secondary college.

Thanks for Alumni’s mail and let me know the current issues in PC.
Regards,
Paulman Chan 陳保宇
_________________________________________________________________________________
From: “B Y LEE
To: “[email protected]”
Sent: Tuesday, July 1, 2014 11:39 AM
Subject: RE: P C College

” NO ” to P C College and return the whole building back to P C Elementary School.

李葆元B Y LEE
Class of 1966
_________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vivian Loh
Date: July 1, 2014 at 2:31:33 PM GMT+8
To: “[email protected]” >
Subject: 培正專業書院
本人同意香港培正同學會會長黎藉冠和十三位學長簽署函件 – 反對培正開辦專業書院副學士等課程。

一九六六年皓社 王瑋瑋
2014年6月30日
__________________________________________________________________________

From: Ginny
To: “[email protected]”
Sent: Tuesday, July 1, 2014 4:30 PM
Subject: 培正專業書院

> 本人同意香港培正同學會會長黎藉冠和十三位學長簽署函件 – 反對培正開辦專業書院副學士等課程。
>
> 一九六六年皓社 葉嘉音
> 2014年7月1曰
____________________________________________________________________________

From: “Lam, Simon
To: HK PUI CHING ALUMNI
Sent: Tuesday, July 1, 2014 6:22 PM
Subject: RE: 致各位培正校友

致香港培正同学会，

本人深表支持众校友的撤销开办私立大专之方案， 恳请同学会黎会长跟进处理相关事宜。
Simon Lam，林世松（1983 凯社）
____________________________________________________________________________

From: dong yau yam
To: Puiching Alumni
Sent: Tuesday, July 1, 2014 4:46 PM
Subject: Re: 培正專業書院

本人唐酉壬（1966年級皓社）認同香港培正同學會會長黎藉冠和十三位學長簽署函件內容 – 反對培正利用新建大樓開辦專業書院副學士等課程。

一九六六年皓社 唐酉壬
2014年7月1日
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: PETER LEE
To: “[email protected]”
Sent: Tuesday, July 1, 2014 11:11 PM
Subject: Re: 培正專業書院

本人同意香港培正同學會會長 黎藉冠及13位學者簽署函件 – 反對培正開辦專業書院副學士等課程。
一九六六年皓社 李宏炬
2014年7月1日
___________________________________________________________________________
From: Josephine Chu
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2014 7:16 AM
Subject: RE: 回覆︰ URGENT REQUEST from HKPCAA

Hello, my name is Josephine Chu, 鄭金枝, class of 1960.

I support the Pui Ching Alumni Association’s position.

Josephine Chu
__________________________________________________________________________________
From: Woon Tong Pang
To: ‘HK PUI CHING ALUMNI’
Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2014 7:53 AM
Subject: RE: 截至20140630_1004 校友回應

黎會長
我們光社 (1959 )同學 除了SS Lau 已表示反對培正專業書院佔校及以培正之名外,
現加上十四 位公開支持同學會. 而全社沒一人表示不同意. 兹將十四人芳名列下 :

陳澎 胡汝源 張卓立 陳端勵 吳錦錫 李銳芬 陸元駿
黎正中 蘇瑞榮 陸志中 李元亨 黃宇楷 區作燊 彭煥棠

我社對閣下表示讚賞與全力支持.
光社社長彭煥棠啟
___________________________________________________________________________________
From: harold soo
To: “[email protected]”
Sent: Tuesday, July 1, 2014 1:54 PM
Subject:

Dear Pui Ching Alumni:
Two lighters (1959) asked me what action are still available to save the primary school. They know that the Baptist school board holds the ownership and this is a foregone conclusion. Instead of all the pleads and complaints, I urge we go into action at once. Bullies are not afraid of words but when actions hurt them, they stop.
1st: I would propose placing a medium size ad in one of the local paper, giving warning to 楊&葉 about a possible lawsuit. The local papers will pursuit this story in a frenzy and give us lots of free publicity. Some of you will worry about washing dirty linen in the public, PC will be dragged through the mud. On the contrary , I think we can show the HK folks that we are a predominant high school in HK, counting among our alumni 1 Nobel Prize Winner, 2 Field medalists and numerous high achievers throughout the Chinese and English speaking worlds. But most important, PC graduates are known for high moral character through the years of inbred Red/Blue spirit.
Such an ad will not cost much and can easily be borne by local HK alumni.
2nd: By now things should be settled. If 楊&葉 still will not desist, then file a lawsuit. It will be hard to win this lawsuit because the board has the ownership. The hope is that in a law court, it is possible to dive beyond 楊&葉 to finger out those board members that are also involved. The Chinese has a proverb “Seen by light, die at once”. The lawsuit will be short and the cost can be easily borne by contribution from all PC classes.
3rd: By now as a last resort, we will send a delegation to the Baptist headquarter in Oklahoma. Oklahoma is in our North American turf and the expenses can be borne by our American delegates. I am sorry to say that those HK Baptist “God Rods” are scared of those white Baptist churches as they have a stricter moral code than those HK churches.
In all our dealings, we should not be subservient to the other side. We are no longer students going to the principal’s office. We are dealing with less than honorable people out to rip out the innards and leave an empty shell to die.
In conclusion, when we have raised such a stink, who in HK will come to this already dead two year college?
I have thrown in my two-cent thinking and I am sure there will be better ideas by other more capable PCer. Also, I am sorry I did not learn to type in Chinese, just too lazy to learn new things, very unPC.
Harold Soo
Class 1959, D38, Soo Sui Wing蘇瑞榮
Los Angeles, CA
June 30, 2014
___________________________________________________________________________
From: Georgina Au
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2014 8:19 AM
Subject: 有關建議停止於培正教育大樓(小學新禮堂上半座)建培正專業書院的呼籲 1983 Au Pui Shan

Dear Pui Ching Alumni Association,
I do agree with the letter as attached.
Thanks and regards,
1983 Au Pui Shan 1983 凱社 區珮珊
From: William H. Wong
To: [email protected];
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 5:03 PM
Subject: 反對用培正之名辦大專

我反對用培正之名辦大專 — 1965 年 耀社, 王浩華
_____________________________________________________________________________________

From: Edward Ho
To: “[email protected]”
Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2014 9:08 AM
Subject: 培專

培正校董會：
請立即停止在培正教育大樓開辦培正專業學院，並作好善後工。

何仲明 (Edward Ho)
IT Director, Navistar Inc., USA
1977 傑社
___________________________________________________________________________________
From: David Ng
To: “[email protected]”
Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2014 10:34 AM
Subject: 反對開辨副學± 1966 皓社

本人反對培正辨副學士

1966 皓社校友 吳大華
____________________________________________________________________________________

From: SM Chung
To: Puiching Alumni
Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2014 11:11 AM
Subject: Re: 致各位培正校友

黎會長暨同學會全体理事，
對黎會長与同學會能代表培正校友發出正義之聲，深表敬意。
對香港培正專業書院處心積慮佔用香港培正小學資源一事，在我社同學平時敍會中，絕大部份耀社同學己表示極大憤慨。
無論從經驗，人才，經濟基础及香港整体教育環境等來看，培正專業書院未有條件可辦上一稱職之專上學府。為何為了少數人之私利与慾望要培正小學作出犧牲和浪費宝貴的資源呢？
我懇切希望浸联會中高等教育部，香港培正中學及培正小學两校校董會能作出明智決定，集中力量辦好中學及小學暨幼稚園，是為培正之光，學生之福。
我完全同意十三位學者學長的意見及支持他們提出的行動。
祝 好。
一九六五年耀社鍾信明啟
2014年七月二日
____________________________________________________________________________________
From: Bennie Lim
To: HK PUI CHING ALUMNI
Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2014 12:35 PM
Subject: Re: 致各培正校友

黎會長:

本人林定邦，1966年級皓社。
本人支持鍾景輝、廖約克、丘成桐…..等學長之呼籲，反對楊國雄、葉賜添等人，於舊禮堂改建之大樓逾半教室，以培正之名，辦一間低水準，乏人申請入讀的大專。

林定邦敬啟
1966年級皓社
2014年7月1日
____________________________________________________________________________________

From: chloe
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2014 2:36 PM
Subject: 反對:在培正大樓開辦培正專業書院

會長您好!

本人特函表示反對在培正大樓開辦培正專業書院!

關詠文啟
2001年 慧社

From: Dr. Lau Sam
To: Puiching Alumni
Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2014 4:16 PM
Subject: my support

Dear Sir,

I fully support HKPCA’s position.

Lau Sum Ping劉森坪 1960正社
__________________________________________________________________________________
From: Pattle Pun
To: “[email protected]”
Cc: Loong Chu ; York Liao
Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2014 10:28 AM
Subject: Fwd: 致各位培正校友

我支持校友的呼声！

潘柏滔1963真社，美國WHEATON COLLEGE，IL 榮譽敎授
__________________________________________________________________________________
From: Wing Lo
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2014 12:44 PM
Subject: Vincent LO Wing-sun, 1963

支持香港培正同學總會反對香港培正專上學院一意孤行，罔顧培正母校之利益及前途之舉措。

盧永新LO WING SUN(1963)
_____________________________________________________________________________________

From: ML Fong
To: in[email protected]; Pui Ching School Alumni Association of Ontario
Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2014 12:51 PM
Subject: Re: Fwd: 致各位培正校友

支持香港培正同學總會反對香港培正專上學院一意孤行，罔顧培正母校之利益及前途之舉措。

方美玲 (1978, 英社)
__________________________________________________________________________________

致：香港培正同學會
黎藉冠會長

反對以培正之名佔用香港培正小學
新建大樓第8至15層辦大專院校

1964年級協社，支持香港培正同學會及鍾景輝、廖約克、丘成桐……等校友發出之呼籲，反對任何人士佔用由培正舊禮堂改建大樓的8至15樓，以培正名義辦「培正專業書院」。理由除了綜合鍾景輝、雷禮和等校友的意見外，還顧慮如此做法，不但侵佔了香港培正小學的業權；破壞了培正小學校舍的獨立性及要培正小學額外負擔該大專所佔用樓層之有關費用，令培正小學在財務上承受額外的負擔，有損培正小學的權益及發展。亦因人流增多，令小學環境變得複雜。

協社同學基於愛護母校，對培正小學新大樓之使用，以至真至誠之心，
謹發出此聯署聲名 ：

李振威 呂文儀 李士英 陸權輝 徐競熙 蘇寶禮 鍾寶穗
劉 璞 鍾寶寧 梁 興 倪靜儀 趙任君 趙 雯 李景德
梁立智 潘恩惠 梁靜遠 陳兆初 蔡芷薇 何耀輝 張靜群
周英強 黃維欣 劉國焜 伍國仰 黃穗儀 何宇登 梁 卿
陳文珠 許遵光 余秀琴 蔡子建 崔湛生 邱偉大 周亞美
甘亞迪 張壽玲 馬民健 武承聖 李曉篷 范更生 徐桂玲
鍾 立 譚北蓮 彭守柱 倪鑑光 石濟時 黃雄熙 王曲泉
梅 雅 李立人 溫賀強 周寧宇 麥慶雲 方 珮 林南屏
陳飛龍 楊自豪 梁明江 廖芷瑩 錢企明 梁美薇 王仁漢
黃家熊 劉應德 梁美美 吳慧君 羅敏麒 梁重倫 源植綿
陳少玲 凌煥賢 宋允鵬 王世濤 鄭婉蘭 曹寶耀(忠)

2014年7月2日
_________________________________________________________________________
From: Shermen Wong
To: “[email protected]”
Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2014 5:37 PM
Subject:

敬啟者：
本人黃文俊乃移居美國加州矽谷地區的1981年勁社畢業校友。謹此聲明本人反對母校成立培正專業書院。
黃文俊
_________________________________________________________________________________________________

From: Jerome & Regina Cheng
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2014 1:04 PM
Subject: 校 友 呼 聲

本人十分同意13位著名學者校友的簽署函件內容及支持香港培正同學總會反對香港培正專上學院一意孤行，罔顧培正母校之利益及前途之舉措, 盼望諸位校監、校董深思，作出明智抉擇, 立即停止在培正教育大樓開辦培正專業學院.

1965 年耀社 鄭寶釗
____________________________________________________________________________________-
From: Kentech
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2014 5:34 PM
Subject: Re : Letter of support

致各位培正校友
本人不贊同培正辦副學士學位.

1957年級輝社趙榮光
香港培正同學會顧問
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

From: KP Chan
To: “[email protected]”
Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2014 8:02 PM
Subject: 香港培正專上學院一意孤行

支持香港培正同學總會反對香港培正專上學院一意孤行，罔顧培正母校之利益及前途之舉措。

Ka Pui Chan 陳加沛1958 銳社

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Edwin Zung
To: “[email protected]”
Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2014 9:21 PM
Subject: 支持香港培正同學總會反對香港培正專上學院一意孤行，罔顧培正母校之利益及前途之舉措

Hi PuiChing Leaders,

I am a proud HK Pui Ching alumni of the class of 1980 穎社. I have been receiving all these emails about this situation. From what I have read so far, I would definitely support the movement to stop the current plan of starting the college.

I do want to hear both sides of the story. If you have other information that was not presented to me, please let me know the reasons behind the decision of starting this college.

If I don’t hear from you, please note that I oppose this decision.

Thank you so much.

Regards,
Edwin Zung程文蔚1980 穎社
________________________________________________________________________________________________

From: sze Fan
To: “[email protected]”
Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2014 8:50 PM
Subject:

Dear Mr. Lai
President, Pui Ching Alumni Association:

I am Fan Sze Yung of Yiu, class of 1965. Having read the letter sent by Mr. Lai regarding the establishing of Pui Ching University, I have this feeling : someone is trying to benefit personally and willing to put both the assets and name of our school at risk. The procedures are definitely too rush and not complete.

Like the public letter signed by so many wise alumni objecting to this proposal of new university, there is absolutely no justification to build a new university in HK. Like so many have indicated, there are already more universities or higher learning institutes than HK will need, now or in the future. The dismal enrollment figure has already shown the truth. The growth of HK population has been slowing down and will not be reversed. The single issue of “where will the future students come from ” should be so obvious as to kill any similar proposal outright. One cannot but suspect the motive of such proposal and strong actions taken. Furthermore, the loan using Pui Ching’s asset as collateral is putting Pui Ching’s finance at risk. Pui Ching School will not benefit but harmed. Pui Ching school should totally detached itself from this new university and let those who are proposing this to establish a separate legal entity and shoulder the benefits ( if ever ) and loss ( should it comes ).

I therefore support the position of Pui Ching Alumni Association and Mr. Lai. Those who support this ridiculous act to establish a new university should be willing to shoulder the entire benefit and risk of their proposal and not involve PUi Ching school at all.

Fan Sze Yung范思雍
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: christin _Wing Society Pui Ching Middle School
To: “[email protected]”
Sent: Friday, July 4, 2014 9:55 AM
Subject: RE: 致各位培正校友

I completely agree it is NOT a time to create another community college in H.K.
It will pull everything downward if it doesn’t successful.
It needs a master plan and many back up plans coordination.
My husband works for UC and city college in L.A. since yr.2000, I completely understand the heart of teaching/education.
But also need a good system on every areas to support, to run, to make it happen.
Please put this college project on HOLD ASAP.

Thank you for your attention.

Christin Chiu 楊艷芳 (1980穎社)
______________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Chiu Lai Sim Betsy
To: “[email protected]”
Sent: Friday, July 4, 2014 8:21 AM
Subject: Letter of support

Dear Pui Ching,

I am writing this email to support the following

支持香港培正同學總會反對香港培正專上學院一意孤行，罔顧培正母校之利益及前途之舉措。

Alumni Student
Chiu Lai-sim 趙麗嬋1965耀社
________________________________________________________________________________________
From: william young
To:[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, July 4, 2014 1:21 AM
Subject: RE: 致各位培正校友

主題：培正暫時不宜開辦大專
培正開辦大專、時機未熟，目前宜優化中學:
1。向政府申請一大幅地或一山頭，以辦大專之精神去辦中學
2。設大球場,泳池及室内運動場及各種球類或体育活動之設施
3。設大專規格之各類新型實驗室及電腦室,及語言實驗室
4。設各種活動專用室,如銀樂隊室,管弦樂隊室,红蓝劇社室、攝影室，平面設計室，家政及烹飪室,男女童軍室,慈善活動室，升學指導及學生輔導等
5。設圖書舘、閱讀室，設有各科指導員之温習室，宗教舘、教堂，大禮堂，中小型會議室訓練會議程序及公衆演講，培養領䄂人才
6。設男女宿舍及飯堂，方便海内外学生,並培養群體精神, 校舍設計具統一兼有特色, 不似舊校修修補補
7。設校巴及对外交通系統
8。初中用粤語教學，中文課本, 並設普通話班, 方便升讀高中; 高中用普通話教學，英文課本,並加強英語之講寫能力，方便出國升學，同時鼓勵學生注意時事,閱讀或評論或翻譯中英文報章社論; 多參加校際比賽
9。多邀請傳教士來傳播福音及教導英語會話，鼓勵学生多閱讀西報,時代雜誌,經濟學人等國際雜誌及收看BBC或CNN
10。設國内學生或華僑學生办事處，招收海外學生並設生活輔導，減輕思家思鄉之情
11。將現時窩打老道校址全部發展小學及幼稚園,以辦中學之精神辨小學，擴大幼稚園及小學
12。起步工作,成立發展委員會.统筹發展及筹款等工作、
我非教育界人仕,尚希有識之仕指正
楊康裔 (1962旭社)
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Eric Lam
Sent: Saturday, July 5, 2014 9:40 AM
Subject: Fw: RE: 致各位培正校友，校董，校監

各位校友學兄學姊，

小弟對康裔學兄之言，百份之二佰讚同，積極提升現有的中小學成績與設施，是事半功倍之實際途徑，反之則事倍而無功，更陷培正先賢百年功業於水火，所為者何? 為名嗎? 必至嗅名傳寰宇，為利嗎? 若不是以權謀私則必是債務疊疊，未有聞具嬌人成績的專上學府能有所盈利，望諸位校監，校董，校長三思，在外校友，無不期望母校能成績裴然，為中學界之龍虎，而不淪為螻蟻之輩，

再者，學長對目前中小學的校舍發展更是高見，中小學校舍己無再進一步的發展空間，中學能另地發展是上上之策，昔日能培育吾等熱愛母校的情懷
除有一定的傳統外，校內設有宿舍及華僑班是極大的因數，想到青少年學子以校為家，以師為父母，多年共同生活，這種人生成長期中美麗而燦爛的一頁是何等的寶貴，友誼的純真是難於在專上院校和工作環境中遇上的，真誠的期望著諸校方主事者，實事求是，不要只求個人名利，更不要出買先賢辛苦耕耘的基業，

Eric Lam林兆庭(63)
______________________________________________________________
From: Tom Lock
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, July 4, 2014 10:52 AM
Subject: 反對用培正名義辦副學士課程

支持香港培正同學總會反對香港培正專上學院一意孤行，罔顧培正母校之利益及前途之舉措。

Tom樂美濤 六五年 耀社
_________________________________________________________________________

From: ericlam
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 2:04:17 PM
Subject: FW: 培正辦副學士課程

本人亦頗有同感，其因由有三，
l， 自七十年代以還，母校元老資深老師日漸退隱，愛護母校之情誼日漸消減，學子成績不復，多有師資不再之感，不若集中資源，加強培育師資，來得事半功倍，
2. 此時創設大專，不但是起步已遲，再者經費來源不免捉襟見肘，做來難會盡善，對學子亦非常不公平，且誤人子弟，
3. 我紅藍兒女，在毌校培養多年後亦應到不同學府擴大視野，增廣不同社群的見織與接觸，若仍留母校大專，不難會養成坐井觀天，夜狼自大，

還是實事求是，集中資源，把母校成績建立得更輝煌，不是更好的選擇嗎?

各位有同感的學姊學長請代傳此心聲與其他校友和毌校當局考慮，

Eric Lam林兆庭(63真社)
________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Daniel Chu
To: “[email protected]”
Sent: Friday, July 4, 2014 4:21 PM
Subject: 英社支持信

黎會長

1978 英社支持信。支持香港培正同學總會反對香港培正專上學院一意孤行，罔顧培正母校之利益及前途之舉措。

朱偉星
________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Ching Yee Leung
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, July 4, 2014 4:22 PM
Subject:

Supported raising our concerns to PC
支持香港培正同學總會反對香港培正專上學院一意孤行，罔顧培正母校之利益及前途之舉措。
Ching Yee Leung
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
From: “jonathan
To: “[email protected]”
Sent: Monday, July 7, 2014 5:22 AM
支持香港培正同學總會反對香港培正專上學院一意孤行，罔顧培正母校之利益及前途之舉措

I am in agreement with Pui Ching Alumni.
I am strongly against the proposal/planning/action of altering Pui Ching Elementary School properties to 香港培正專上學院.
The direction of 香港培正專上學院 and past result of it does not represent the spirit and reputation of Pui Ching.
The existence of 香港培正專上學院 within Pui Ching Property will damage the reputation of Pui Ching and in danger Pui Ching students.

I even against their usage of 香港培正 as part of their collage name.

Sincerely
Jonathan Ma (1978 英社)
___________________________________________________________________________________________
1969昇社同學聯署
反對培專佔用培正小學新建之大樓數層開辦副學士課程

泰國 羅光凱 香港 李世碩，吳碧嫻 美國加州 吳垣灼
香港 畢崇康、陳瑞蘭 香港 馬長貴 台灣 熊健群
香港 李偉齡 香港 余嘯天 (前東華三院主席) 加拿大 多倫多 勞丹妮
香港 任國信 美國加州 汪大成 美國密芝根州 寇懷誠
美國加州 譚瑞欽
2014-07-04
From: Anna Wong
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, July 6, 2014 12:31 AM
Subject: 反對開辦私立大專

致培正母校:
因時閒緊迫,海外同學皆欲立刻致函: 關於香港培正專業書院正準備在新落成的培正教育大樓第八層至十五層，招生開辦 副學士等課程，培正小學張廣德校長無奈地已交出鎖匙，以便裝修校舍。鑒於香港 開辦私立大專院校不合時宜，而且辦得不好，對培正聲譽有負面影響。懇請有關校監、校董，撤銷此案. 謝謝!

楊淑媛1966 晧社,黃宇平1962旭社
加拿大溫哥華寄出
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
On Jul 5, 2014, at 5:38 PM,

1966年級皓社聯署
我們正在發起聯署行動，邀請香港及海外皓社同學加入，聯名去信支持培正同學會黎藉冠會長，反對培正專業學院在培正教育大樓開辦副學士課程。

鄧文正 黃維榮 李澤民
陳嘉雯 龔江勇 郭乾初
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Ty Mak
Sent: Monday, July 7, 2014 4:55 AM
Subject: Re: Please support the objection, reply to sender before 2014-07-10

I agree to support!!!!
Mak Tse Fai麥梓輝
________________________________________________________________________________
From: winston yu
To: “[email protected]”
Sent: Monday, July 7, 2014 9:30 AM
Subject: Re: 培正教育大樓

我本人支持香港培正同學會
余永康1966皓社
_________________________________________________________________________________________

From: 1961善社
To: “[email protected]” ;
Sent: Sunday, July 6, 2014 1:48 AM
Subject: Pui Ching school

致香港培正同學會,
We, the class of 1961 善社, strongly and whole heartedly support the Pui Ching Alumni Association to request the Pui Ching College to stop using the campus of Pui Ching School. The use of any part of the new 15 story building by people not part of Pui Ching School should not be allowed. The principal of Pui Ching Primary School should not be allowed to give a key to the new building to the new college. The new college should not be allowed to use Pui Ching as part of its name.

This action by members of the board of the Pui Ching Academy has raised the wrath of our members and a lot of Pui Ching Alumni. The backlash will be serious and significant. Please withdraw this action and do not destroy our faith of and love to our school. Pui Ching has a wonderful reputation world wide and has tremendous success. The outstanding name of Pui Ching will be ruined if the 3rd rated academy is allowed to use the name of Pui Ching and occupy any part of the campus of Pui Ching School.

Do not forget Pui Ching Alumni all over the world has contributed greatly to the funding for the construction of the new 15 story building. It would be difficult to raise any funds from Pui Ching Alumni in the future if the new college is allowed to use any part of the new building.
Respectfully.
1961 善社同學:
胡劍豪, 陳潤國, 高子敏, 胡炎章, 謝錫恆, 許行, 同哲賜, 殷健明, 張毓毅, 唐冬明, 石錦之, 朱祟禧,
蔡宗磐, 黃馨龍, 王旦華, 梅瑜, 黃祖同, 陳秉麟, 林鎮藩, 鄭公國, 汪桂麗, 陳琛銘. 朱炳超, 陳維松，
陳維超，毛紀寬，謝景享
_________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Stanley Shiu
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, July 6, 2014 5:20 PM
Subject:
I folly support the Pui Ching Alumni Association.

My name is Hok-Cheun Shiu蕭學泉 class of 1960 正社.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Paulo Lam
To: HK PUI CHING ALUMNI
Cc: HK puiching alumni
Sent: Monday, July 7, 2014 12:52 AM
Subject: Re: 致各位培正校友
Support your point of view.
Paulo Lam智社
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Kenneth Leung
To: puiching.org
Sent: Monday, July 7, 2014 3:44 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: Please support the objection, reply to sender before 2014-07-10

Sirlam,
I totally support to oppose the issue. But I can not find the letter to reply as you suggested. Please make it clear how to send my objection letter. Please make it simple because lots of our classmates are not too keen on using the computer. Thanks.

Ken梁錦濤
______________________________________________________________________________________________

From:1955忠社chung house
Sent: Monday, July 7, 2014 3:22 AM
Subject: Fw: Please support the objection, reply to sender before 2014-07-10

各位忠社同學:
母校培正之當權者昧於香港現實,耗盡資源發展全無前景,現己過飽和之專上學院. 辦理全不受社會認同接納的副學士學位.在十九間學院中排列末位. 今年度只招得學生3名, 令我們覺得十分羞辱.此舉不單影响培正名聲,更令中小學財資枯竭,礙改善和發展.近日又強行佔用新建大樓.彼等之一意弧行,令培正陷於極度危險之境地. 各情想早蒙垂注.鍾景輝社長及十二位知名學者校友聯署公開信反對上述之措施.兹附上該函及同學會公告, 敬請察閱.我等擬發起忠社同學聯名電郵聲援鍾景輝等反對意見, 祈望集合更多校友力量使校董們覺悟, 改變初衷, 臨崖勒馬. 免致百年基業, 毁於一旦.
如果你有同感願意列名, 只要用你常用電郵信箱寫
‘I agree to support’ , 按 ‘reply to sender’ 便可.因事關教育問題, 學術教育界之意見最受重視, 所以你若是該界人仕, 請加註退休前服務單位及職銜. (支持信內容稿附於此信後)對不用電郵同學, 無法逐一告知. 望就近轉告詳情, 並代其報名參加. (多倫多同學最為隔閡,請劉國勳, 黄勝幫幫忙)如果你擬發表個人意見,甚表歡迎,當代轉達.請在7月 10 日前回覆, 俾即辦理,免失時效.
耑此奉達, 並候近安

發起者 : 卓以和, 沈呂九, 蘇輝祖, 魯志揚, 曾廣營, 江心敏, 戴可強,林錫衡(執筆及聯絡) 同啓
2014-07-06

1955忠社聯署名單:
鍾景輝 丘銘筑 何家鏗 王輝泰 張奮雄
卓以和 梁錦濤 郭子雲 李振伍 陳敏娜
沈呂九 張正麟 黄鍾麒 郭彥弘 何 營
蘇輝祖 曾全方 彭星楠 李錦賜 呂羅西
魯志揚 麥梓輝 梁啓義 梅榮輝 梁鑑澄
曾廣營 戴蘭祥 伍宏育 鍾靈秀
江心敏 馮肇邦 林伯偉 伍維章
戴可強 鄧國謀 曹慶安 謝瑞津
林錫衡 劉智遠 翁南傑 劉粵琛
孫必勝 蕭寅定 王燕秋 劉國勳
蔡子良 鍾美麗 余松光 陳隆聲
王載寶 薛又梅 黃寬猛 周興文
甘嘉澧 鄧 璆 彭星泉 方翹楚

________________________________________________________________________
From: 學生家長利安齡 袁兆禧
To: “[email protected]”
Sent: Friday, July 4, 2014 11:23 PM
Subject: 反對用培正之名辦大專

敬愛的張校長：
作為家長，有一事令我十分擔憂，據聞新大樓有多層會開辦培正專業書院。培正有百多年歷史，提供優質教學，我們也是慕名而來，香港培正辦大專，將會收甚麽類型的學生 ?如今專上辦學氾濫，若學生質素不佳或收生不足定必影響培正校譽，亦會影響我即將就讀的子女，望校方能三思。最後亦最重要我們希望培小的資源百分百用在小學上。
以上意見，敬希關注考慮，敬祝教安!

學生家長利安齡袁兆禧敬上
_______________________________________________________________________________________________

張校長:
欣聞新大樓於三月中取得入伙紙，而你亦宣佈本年度之畢業禮、結業禮有很大機會可在大禮堂舉行，而幼稚園更是首個使用新禮堂的團體，實在覺得既開心，又榮幸。
感謝校方的努力，讓培正有新校舍，使我們的子女能在理想的校園接受教育，亦可盡量發揮他們的體藝潛能。不過我們家長擔心大樓上的「培正專業書院」。據知「培正專業書院」將開辦專上文憑課程，幼稚園與大樓緊接，且互相通連，恐怕有大專生進入培小培幼校園，造成滋擾，畢竟幼兒細小，未能懂得保護自己，萬一出現意外，責任誰屬?其次我們察覺報讀大專文憑課程人士，良莠不齊，將來會與我們的子女共同進出校園，不單影響就讀的學生，亦會影響培正百年校譽，我們相信，培正是一所優質的中、小、幼一條龍學校，希望校方能專心一政辦好學校，謝謝。

一群幼稚園家長
2014年4月29日
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

From: lindasychan
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, July 4, 2014 7:45 PM
Subject: Pui ching Support

Support !

___________________________________________________________________________________________
各位紅藍同學 :
獲悉由培正校友資助，培正小學獨力興建的培正教育大樓已經落成，十分欣慰。不幸的是培正專業書院竟然打算佔用其中第8至15層，以開辦一些副學士等課程，全球培正人深感憂慮，其原因有三 :

(1) 由於香港已經有8所UGC-funded大學，另有8所自負盈虧大學(其中七所私立大學，一所公開大學) ，19所專上院校，合共35所大學及專上學院，它們大都開設有副學士課程，由於供求失衡，條件較差的如培專書院，實難招收足夠的自費學生。下表列出各校招生的結果。培正專業書院收生情況，實在不忍卒睹，入讀率只有2%，這對培正嘉名，簡直是個羞辱。

(2) 2013年一些董事曾經企圖背著培正，將新培正教育大樓按予香港政府，以取得1.8億圓貸款經營培專。由於全球培正校友反對而作罷。現在開辦培專書院，不知有否通過可行性研究, 有否周詳的財務預算計劃( Financial Budget Plan) 。萬一收支不平衡，出現赤字，難保不會拖著培小落水。如資不抵債而倒閉關門，將有負社會及家長學生的期望。

(3) 培正是本港之名校，校風名列前茅 。 培專招收低成績學生 (14分或10分下) ，學生來自四方八面，良莠不齊，同在一棟教學大樓進出，對培 幼 培小學生及家長，很有負面影嚮。將來是否會嚇走一部份家長和學生，實難預料。

綜上所述，我們認為，花大力氣辦一所連培正子弟都不屑入讀的學院，有違培正先賢的宗旨。以目前香港教育環境，無政府資助而自資辦大專，就算有樹仁鍾期榮、胡鴻烈伉儷的毅力和抱負，也絕對難有成效。謹以校友之至誠，望諸位校監、校董深思，作出明智抉擇，立即停止在培正教育大樓開辦培正專業學院，並作好善後工作。

多謝大家關心母校事工！

敬祝 安康

家長義工隊
________________________________________________________________________________________________

From: marie ho
To:[email protected]
Sent: July 3, 2014 7:06 PM
Subject: 反對用培正之名辦大專

「校監」應引疚辭職，「眾校董」也應辭職。
何必掛名做校董，違反十誡中之
「不可偷盜」；「不可作假見證」！
「培正教育慘淡營」，幾經千辛萬苦走難，眾老師職工愛護學校，克苦耕耘，蒙神保守，歷一百二十五年之久，才有今日之成績。
奉勸「校董會」：
不要再假借「書院」之名，侵吞培正小學的財富，及霸佔「培正小學教學大樓」。
「培正校董會」必須臨涯勒馬，切勿胡非亂作，引火焚身。
「人在做」，「神在望」。香港浸信會聯會，若置之不理，必使浸會之名譽掃地。
「家長的眼晴是雪亮的」，一定向政府有門關部門投訴。一旦東窗事發，違法者，必受法律制裁。
芨芨可危的浸信會，實令人痛心。
懇求上主施恩拯救「培正小學」，及祝福有良知，愛護母校之「培正同學會」！

1956瑩社李梅麗牧師有感
__________________________________________________________________________________________________

From: Danny Kwok
To: 同學會Puiching
Sent: Monday, July 7, 2014 1:09 PM
Subject: 反對用培正之名辦大專

1990年級騰社以下同學, 同意 會長 和 [校友的呼聲] 的論點, 聯署反對以培正名義辦專上學校

排名不分先後 :

梁耀輝 賴湘凌 郭秀山 陳秋兒 鄭志彥
勞肇沖 劉婉玲 余俊榮 黎鎮豪 歐陽偉倫
陳景耀 雷首陽 朱錦輝 袁兆禧
陸効民 廖健航 傅雪詠 謝永誠
何芷美 程海錠 衛祿詩 劉斯凱
劉志昂 何雅詩 麥蔚茵 朱錦冰
________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Hu LM
To: [email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 8, 2014 3:14 PM
Subject: Re: 反對開辦私立大專

反對.對培正會百害而無一利.

皓社許文海________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: 黃家樂
To: [email protected];
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 6:17 AM
Subject: RE: Fw: 反對用培正之名辦大專

我反對用培正之名辦大專
黃家樂, 1965 年 耀社
__________________________________________________________________________________________________

From: hoi house
To: [email protected]>
寄件日期： 2014/7/8 (週二) 9:21 AM
主旨： 凱社聯函

致 : 香港培正同學會會長及各校友

就香港培正專業書院選址香港培正小學新落成之教育大樓8至15樓開辦副學士課程一事上，實屬不合時宜。我社十分同意會長及多方學長之立場，強烈反對香港培正專業書院利用香港培正中小學有限資源開辦課程，考慮到將會大大削弱培正中、小學未來之發展空間。我社亦明白香港培正專業書院只屬一所獨立機構，絕不能與一所達125年悠久歷史之傳統優質學府扯上任何關係。特聯函懇請校監及校董三思，撤銷此方案。

敬祝安康

1983凱社校友

曾少玲 程家蔚 張運元 曾少賢 謝南思
謝美望 吳秋伶 伍思琳 李寶翠 游美蘭
鄭以欣 黃小玲 孫文輝 梁偉剛 林憶朋
譚婉嫻 張麗珠 周麗嫦 梁文舒 應耀芬
陳玉宏 關宜敏 周潔心 熊 濤 丘婉霞
董慧蘭 陳以禮 阮勵祈 葉翠璋 陳秀琴
黃美圓 鍾偉儀 葉曉冰 張美霞 游天鴻
馬秀萍 楊妙貞 李麗珊 施意南 馬德財
郭詠慈

二O一四年七月八日
__________________________________________________________________________________________________

寄件人︰ John Tsang
收件人: [email protected]
傳送日期︰ 2014年07月8日 (週二) 12:22 AM
主題︰ Pui Ching expansion

Dear sir/madam,

I strongly oppose the expansion of Pui Ching Middle School into the college level. The responsible individuals should have thorough communications with the alumni before its implementation. The required business plan and resources remain dubious at this stage. Please listen to the voices of the graduates and act prudently. Doing things in a hurry does not make it right. We will follow closely.

Sincerely yours,
1966年級皓社曾英材
John Ying Choi Tsang MD
Ho Society, 1966
Professor of Medicine
University of British Columbia

From: John Tsang
To: HK PUI CHING ALUMNI ; Kin chor Kwok
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2014 1:09 AM
Subject: Re: 轉寄︰ Pui Ching expansion

Dear Michael et al,

As the alumni position is beginning to consolidate and time is pressing, we should also focus more on action and discuss the following preliminary ideas:

1. Seek legal advice and call for an injunction through the court, if applicable.
2. Seek complete audit of Pui Ching asset and liability by an international audit firm, many of which have branches in HK. Clarify any corruption.
3. Obtain more direct info with the principal of Pui Ching Junior School.
4. Declaration of alumni postion on future donation if the board proceeds despite objection.
5. All of these needs money from the alumni. Consider some fundraising if we are to take action in earnest. I will contribute.

This is just brainstorming. The approach is to buy time and get better info on both sides. Finance is only part of the problems. The other aspects are the reputation and scholastic excellence of our school, as well as the long established cordial relatonship between the school and the graduates.

Thank you for listening.

John Tsang
1966

From: John Tsang
To: HK PUI CHING ALUMNI ; Kin chor Kwok
Cc: w. woo
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2014 11:22 PM
Subject: Re: 轉寄︰ Pui Ching expansion

Dear Michael et al,

We are in the process of establishing a plan to stop this very questionable expansion. Attached please find my suggestions in the strategy and tactics that may be useful. Please feel free to adopt or omit these items. Thank you very much for your considerations.

At the August meeting in HK, Please take a firm position.

John Ying Choi Tsang 曾英材
1966

July 25, 2014.

Re: Pui Ching expansion

1. Strategy:

To challenge and delay the expansion ASAP in all fronts
To establish political transparency and thoroughly understand the governance
To establish financial transparency
To enhance the role of alumni association

2. Policy

To maintain vigilance by Alumni on Pui Ching Board activities for unilateral action
To support Pui Ching Junior and Middle School in keeping their resources and improve their academic excellence
To reduce alumni donation until further clarification

3. Operation

To elect/appoint ad hoc executive committee by Alumni
To organize fundraising activities by alumni and establish a ready war chest fund
To seek out commitment of alumni in general, beyond a few higher committed people
To promote election of more alumni into the School Board
To delay expansion for this first “critical” year and seek in-junction if possible in court

4. Tactics (cost $): It’s not cheap

To hire financial auditing by international firm, e.g. Deloitte, and keep ongoing monitor.
To go to court in multiple fronts by individual graduating years and force negotiation
To promote publicity in news media by PR firm and create uncertainty for first year registrants
To seek mandatory alumni representatives in Board (50%)
To move celebration activities on Pui Ching Alumni Day in December outside campus.

Namely, to delay, obstruct, protest and cost. At the very least, we can move forward after a warning shot and mitigate corruption. If this expansion moves ahead, it does so under a shadow.

Presently, there are also scholarships under teachers’ name, e.g. Lau Choi Yun, that remain hidden somewhere in the PC Treasury and may disappear quietly over time into some unknown pockets.

Respectfully yours,
Tsang, Ying Choi
Ho Society, 1966

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

From: 1966皓社聯署
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2014 2:46 PM
Subject: 培正專業書院

我們（1966年級皓社校友）認同及支持香港培正同學會會長黎藉冠和十三位學長簽署函件內的論點 –
反對培正開辦專業書院副學士等課程。

英汝興 陳德華 王瑋瑋 顧明均 錢世庸 唐酉壬 鄧文正 黃維榮 李澤民
陳嘉雯 龔江勇 郭乾初 嚴秀婷 丘成桐 鄭紹遠 何宜浩 黃妙明 李本沃
陳慶新 陳令偉 袁慕貞 岑邦豪 余紹康 徐肇明 吳善強 鄧國麟 林玉珍
陳君炎 葉嘉音 黃雪影 黃美芬 黃希真 鄒秉志 雷綺琴 梁秀珊 鄺碧玲
陳美金 劉新瓊 趙玉紅 陳雁珍 湯靜虹 張修治 陳慎輝 張均策 李潤錚
陳行方 梁永焯 顧海銘 金福介 何汝傑 陳志亮 何鎮英 張幼惠 包國源
石繼承 曾英材 梁健行 劉基和 林定邦 許麗芬 馬秀蓮 陳日女 陳聘珠
余永康 鍾寶蓮 童怡青 陳麗詩 麥婉賢 文碧鏗 陳偉林 區耀華 李宏炬
吳大華 謝哲華 蔡永祥 廖國佑 馮貽安 陳展誠 藍玉琛 溫麗珍 梁秀瑚
廖芷玲 陳瑞玲 蔡憲薇 唐蘊志 周曼梨 余則修 劉鐵生 陳國忠 陳雅文
鄺子青 黃 本 黃煥正 方 漢 雷柳媚 林一流
1966年級皓社
2014年7月11日

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

From: Seymour Inn
To: “[email protected]” ;
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 8:09 AM
Subject: 反對用培正之名辦大專

我反對用培正之名辦大專

六五年級耀社阮壽彭, Houston Texas, USA

Thanks,
Seymour Inn
________________________________________________________________________________________________

致: 培正同學總會
香港浸信會聯會 莫江庭會長
總幹事林守光牧師
中小學及持續教育部羅永祥部長

本人 ( 共108名同學) 支持鍾景輝、廖約克、丘成桐…等十三位學者學長[ 校友的呼聲]
##第三點除外, 但對校內保安仍表示關注。強烈反對浸聯會中高等教育部、培正中學 及培正小學兩校的校董會、楊國雄、葉賜添等人, 用培正之名作任何損害培正中小學 名譽、產權、任何利益、未來發展的行為。
跟據基督教與香港早期社會• 李志剛著, 培正之名其意義是[ 培植教會子弟，免送俗 塾，有失正虞] ， 願當權者回到培正校訓 [ 至善至正-你要謹守聽從我所吩咐的一切 話，行耶和華─ 你神眼中看為善，看為正的事。這樣，你和你的子孫就可以永遠享福。申命記十二章28節] 憑良心以基督的精神辦學，以不負主耶穌基督、中小學創校者 及各歷任校監、校長的厚望。
如事件只屬校友們未能掌握事實之全部或對其有所誤會，敬希有關當局能召開特別大 會或打開任何溝通的渠道，免得事件隨著時間發酵難以收復。作為一所基督教的學校 是要作鹽作光，以防他人跌倒。

敬祝 平安! 敬啟2014 年 7 月 12 日
聯署名單:
葉國平 ( 1959光社) 陳妙玲 ( 1970謙社) 陳樹萱 ( 1970謙社)
陳慧玲 ( 1970謙社) 陳嫣娜 ( 1970謙社) 張美娟 ( 1970謙社)
張小靈 ( 1970謙社) 姜麗華 ( 1970謙社) 趙善强 ( 1970謙社)
趙惠芳 ( 1970謙社) 趙㦤英 ( 1970謙社) 周頴儀 ( 1970謙社)
朱鎮威 ( 1970謙社) 朱起疆 ( 1970謙社) 朱嘉樂 ( 1970謙社)
范杏芳 ( 1970謙社) 何鳯琴 ( 1970謙社) 顧克基 ( 1970謙社)
關耀文 ( 1970謙社) 黎秀珊 ( 1970 謙社) 頼智雄 ( 1970謙社)
劉紀信 ( 1970謙社) 李錦培 ( 1970謙社) 李啟初 ( 1970謙社)
李 梨 ( 1970謙社) 李明媚 ( 1970 謙社) 李大成 ( 1970 謙社)
李群英 ( 1970謙社) 李曼梨 ( 1970 謙社) 梁家榮 ( 1970謙社)
梁僑翹 ( 1970謙社) 梁君慧 ( 1970 謙社) 馬 剛 ( 1970謙社)
麥 銓 ( 1970謙社) 吳健森 ( 1970 謙社) 潘雪玲 ( 1970謙社)
孫北平 ( 1970謙社) 譚健瑛 ( 1970 謙社) 謝 成 ( 1970謙社)
鄔美愉 ( 1970謙社) 楊靄慈 ( 1970謙社) 嚴嫣紅 ( 1970謙社)
葉榮銓 ( 1970謙社) 欣伯權 ( 1970謙社) 茹名苑 ( 1970謙社)
袁貞偉 (1970謙社) 麥志强 ( 1973勤社) 溫敬道 ( 1983凱社)
鍾偉傑 ( 1983凱社) 葉穎婷 ( 1985博社) 劉登群 ( 1985博社)
余 銘 ( 1985博社) 張立茜 ( 1987德社) 區永剛 ( 1987德社)
李欣欣 ( 1987德社) 葉穎姍 ( 1988曦社) 古緯詩 ( 1988曦社)
麥淑如 ( 1988曦社) 鄧寶雲 ( 1988曦社) 謝綺齡 ( 1988曦社)
陳巧儀 ( 1988曦社) 容穎思 ( 1988曦社) 陳國邦 ( 1988曦社)
張志立 ( 1988曦社) 張承啟 ( 1988曦社) 李嘉智 ( 1988曦社)
葉志豪 ( 1988曦社) 羅志暉 ( 1988曦社) 楊開娜 ( 1988曦社)
黃祖蔭 ( 1988曦社) 莫子強 ( 1988曦社) 蘇麗文 ( 1988曦社)
王國海 ( 1988曦社) 黃愛媚 ( 1988曦社) 李志鵬 ( 1988曦社)
湯 捷 ( 1988曦社) 霍 崢 ( 1988曦社) 潘國東 ( 1988曦社)
馮婉儀 ( 1988曦社) 何少華 ( 1988曦社) 陳依玲 ( 1988曦社)
鄧景雲 ( 1988曦社) 彭皓源 ( 1988曦社) 莫潔亷 ( 1988曦社)
李靖偉 ( 1988曦社) 李兆璋 ( 1988曦社) 羅婉玲 ( 1988曦社)
吳家敏 ( 1988曦社) 林正華 ( 1988曦社) 梁建龍 ( 1988曦社)
黃嘉聰 ( 1988曦社) 蔡明 ( 1988曦社) 胡春薇 ( 1988曦社)
廖錦藝 ( 1988曦社) 方美詩 ( 1988曦社) 關兆賢 ( 1988曦社)
李詠詩 ( 1988曦社) 黃雅欣 ( 1988曦社) 王德賜 ( 1988曦社)
張兆龍 ( 1988曦社) 黃建宏 ( 1988曦社) 龐穎思 ( 1988曦社)
黃燕筠 ( 1988曦社) 孫淑芬 ( 1988曦社) 余愷謙 ( 1988曦社)
朱楓華 ( 1989禮社) 甄民慧 ( 1989禮社) 溫心予 ( 2017愛社)

From: 勤社
To: Pui Ching Alumni Association
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 2:03 PM
Subject: 有關要求浸聯會停辦培正專業書院

黎會長大鑒：

六月底接獲同學會轉來十三位學長呼籲浸聯會停辦培正專業書院之信件，及同學會呼籲谷級社支持來函，本社隨即於面書上刊登兩封信函，並收集社友意見。現按截至七月十四日止，贊同十三位學長所言要求浸聯會停辦培正專業書院之社友，及雖不及對浸聯會辦專上學院，但反對冠以培正之名和使用培正小學之資源者，將其姓名列出如下。

支持十三位學長建議，呼籲浸聯會停辧培正專業書院（53 位）：
呂沛德、屈錦樑、陳家傑、鍾麗芬、傅可緯、吳淑明、李國俊、楊敏麗、湛兆萍、陳美玲、吳欽禮、梅健全、呂少珍、藤紹駿、
馬陽明、周之瑜、林懷傑、吳麗君、麥志強、黃靄群、趙中復、張少偉、吳堉洲、李家和、黃萬滿、陳 燕、黃世民、梁潔文、
黃婉貞、林志嫦、余曼彤、屈婉池、劉逸禎、呂禮聰、楊慧兒、容應傑、陳 琪、張翠芳、何少隸、甄明德、錢志和、羅浩源、
朱恩穗、陳瑞芬、葉炎忠、林祺玲、李碩生、羅錫強、陳淑賢、程頌平、陳婉華、盧美慈、李淑虹

不反對浸聯會辦專上學院，惟反對以“培正”名義開辦及侵蝕培正小學資源（10 位）：
羅應權、伍永基、張金城、陳維彪、楊傳榮、黃佩蘭、蘇祟亮、梁永光、齊銥、陳德仁

祝 身體健康、會務蒸蒸日上
____________________________________________________________________________________________________

From: kslam
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 10:18 AM
Subject: 反對用培正之名辦大專

本人同意香港培正同學會會長 黎藉冠 及其他培正同學會會友, 反對用培正之名辦大專,
林健生 1971年 剛社.
__________________________________________________________________________________
From: Po Ping Young
To: “[email protected]”
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 10:08 AM
Subject: 反對用培正名義辦大專

同意香港培正同學會會長黎藉冠，及其他培正同學會會友，反對用培正之名辦大專。

楊波平 1965 年 耀社
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Margaret Tsai
To: [email protected];
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 3:36 PM
Subject: 反對用培正之名辦大專
我反對用培正之名辦大專
甘亜敏, 1965 年 耀社
________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Christina Yip
To: HK PUI CHING ALUMNI ;
Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2014 1:31 AM
Subject: RE: 致各位培正校友

Michael,
Totally agree with you. Should cut our losses and move on. You have my full support on this.
Thank you for bringing it up to all the alumni attention.
* Is this email sent to all alumni? Should I forward this to all my cousins and my sister who graduated from Pui Ching or you already took care of it?
Thanks again.
Chris
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

From: Heston Chau
To: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2014 4:13 AM
Subject: 三藩市培正同學會對校友的呼聲回應

收到黎藉冠會長和前會長雷禮和的電郵，閱讀過香港培正同學會網站登載的「校友的呼聲」，及日前與培正小學張廣德校長通過長途電話， 以下是三藩市培正同學會對培正專業書院使用培正教育大樓的立場：
( 一) 我們反對 “培專” 利用培正小學的資源來辦此低水平的大專。 經查核後，其實有好幾位校董是同時任職於 “培專”、”培中”及”培 小”的校董會。”培專” 之所以能遷入屬於培正小學的教育大樓， 推手是誰，大家心知肚明。

請參考下列三校校董會名單:
培正中學校董會 培正小學校董會
培正專業書院院董會

陳之望博士: 校監
楊國雄博士
鄭成業先生
羅志強先生
鍾鴻鈞教授
羅永祥博士
陳炳祥博士
葉惠康博士
顧明均先生
李黃敏儀女士
曾家石先生
劉國偉先生
麥志偉先生
吳宣倫博士 陳之望博士: 校監
楊國雄博士: 校董
王寧添博士
鍾鴻鈞博士
葉惠康博士
鄭成業先生
羅志強先生
陳炳祥先生
李樹輝先生
顧明均先生
黎藉冠先生 楊國雄博士: 主席
羅志強先生
葉惠康博士
陳之望博士
何鏡煒博士
張志儉博士
鍾鴻鈞教授
何顯雄博士
羅永祥博士

(二) 我們反對 “培專” 使用培正教育大樓六成面積而沒有負責付出六成 的建築費用。
(三) 我們反對 “培專” 院董會沒有明確表示 “培專” 經費來源及如何承 擔六成培正教育大樓的租金和運作費用。
(四) 我們反對 “培專” 以不合理的代價使用培正教育大樓而危害和耗盡 培正小學的儲備基金。

所以我們懇請：
( 一) “培專” 院董會成員，不能同時任職培正小學校董會或培正中學校 董會，以示明確袛代表某一單元的利益、角度、運作和决策。
(二) “培專” 院董會向培正校友公開 “培專” 的教育目標、大綱、 經費 來源，及與培正小學的租約條文，以示 “培專” 辦學的誠意。
(三) 當然我們深切期望將來 “培專” 校務蒸蒸日上，在社會上有一 定 的聲望，作育英才。但萬一校務上有挫折，財政出現赤字，債務 絕對不能寄在培正小學肩上，”培專”要盈虧自負。
(四) “培專”與培正小學共用一樓，人流複雜。”培專”師資、招生要倍 加小心謹慎，以免事故而威脅到培小學生的安全，和毀壞培正的 聲譽。

以上是本會理事們經慎重考慮，多次討論的提議，敬希明鑒。 三藩市培正同學會
會長 周榮超 ( 1967 年恆社 )
副會長 談雲衢 ( 1958 年銳社 )
戚嘉慧 ( 1977 年傑社 )
理事 孫必興 ( 1957 年輝社 ) 范更生 ( 1964年協社)
鄭國輝 ( 1957 年輝社 ) 吳麗齡 ( 1965 年耀社)
何汝顯 ( 1957 年輝社 ) 陳淑賢 ( 1973年勤社)
黃維廉 ( 1959 年光社 ) 勞錦儀 ( 1976年敏社)
李威漢 ( 1961 年善社 ) 李 健 ( 1976年捷社)
余光源 ( 1961 年善社 ) 史天慧 ( 2006年禧社)
李曉蓬 ( 1964 年協社 )

寄件者： Vera Cheng < 收件者： "[email protected]"
寄件日期： 2014/7/18 (週五) 8:48 AM
主旨： 反對用培正之名辦大專

本人同意香港培正同學會會長 黎藉冠 及其他培正同學會會友, 反對用培正之名辦大專。

李小華1965 年 耀社
___________________________________________________________________________________________
寄件者： Andrew Ho
收件者： [email protected]
寄件日期： 2014/7/19 (週六) 7:53 AM
主旨： 我反對用培正之名辦大專

我反對用培正之名辦大專

何衛華, 1965 年 耀社
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
From: 陸綺琴
To: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2014 8:51 PM
Subject: 我反對用培正之名辦大專

我反對用培正之名辦大專
陸綺琴, 1965 年 耀社
____________________________________________________________________________
From: Margaret
To: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 11:02 AM
Subject: PC Academy

This is to note that I do not agree with the planning to use Pui Ching Primary school asset for the establishment of Pui Ching Academy.

柯珂Class of 65
From: Lo
To: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 2:40 PM
Subject: 培正專業書院

本人是90年代畢業的校友，陰差陽錯下曾任教培正教育中心。

整體而言本人就教育中心，特別是他們的學生，是非常失望的（為免生疑別，此前本人曾於其他學校任教差不多 10 年，經驗是終生難忘地愉快的，不少當年的學生現在都成了我的好朋友）。

有道說有教無類，然而，就本人所見，教育中心根本的問題不只是學生的資質，而是當中頗多學生根本毫無學習動機可言，本人當時甚至懷疑，他們來上課是希望學習一技之長，還是因為光坐在班上就能領津貼。上課期間用揚聲器大聲播音樂、上網玩遊戲、考試時連揭開問題簿也嫌費勁等「學生」，是本人教育生涯中難以忘懷的慘痛經驗。這樣的學生考試成績不好是理所當然的，然而主任老師卻要求以補充習作等方式調整分數及合格率，以避免被資助機構怪罪學生的成績不好。那根本就是本末倒置的做法。

本人在教育中心只待了半年，有教學熱誠的老師很難在那裏待久。除了圓圓的大招牌外，那裏壓根兒就不是培正。

這麼多年過去了，毒瘤不光沒有消失，還長出了更大更毒的肉芽來。在養份都被肉瘤抽個精光的情況下，宿主希望不「教育生涯慘淡營」？難矣。
Lo
From: Bill/Clara Chan
To: “[email protected]”
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 7:50 AM
Subject: SUBJECT MISUSE OF PUICHING MIDDLE SCHOOL FUND

WE OPPOSE USING PUICHING’S NAME FOR ANY PURPOSE IF IT IS NOT FOR THE BENEFIT OF PUICHING HIGHT SCHOOL, PUICHING MIDDLE SCHOOL AND PUICHING GRADE SCHOOL.

陳海榮BILL CHAN HOI-WING (65 YIU) AND林鳳潔CLARA LAM FUNG-KIT (65 YIU)

____________________________________________________________________________________________

From: nancy pattarathammas
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2014 11:40 AM
Subject: 强烈反对培正专业书院

强烈反对培正专业书院 “盜用培正商標”霸佔培正小學校舍 挪用培正小學資源

黃昆臨 1963真 劉冠賢 1970謙 徐伯祥 1978英 劉冠慶 1968仁
楊榮宗 1961善 李樹青1968仁 蔡漢金 1969昇 徐廣富 1968仁
徐位禮 1968仁 廖耀濬 1965耀 譚佩松

泰國曼谷培正同學會聯署
2014年7月26日
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: John Sun
To: Puiching Alumni
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 1:18 AM
Subject: Open Letter, Opinions, and Recommendations in Support of 培正同學會
　
　
Dear黎藉冠培正同學會長, 培正同學:

As a Pui Ching (PC) alumnus, I am deeply concerned about a series of unfortunate incidences that plagued our school in the recent years. In response to the urgent letter of (維校譽護新廈) 紅藍校友論壇, I would like to submit my opinions and recommendations to our honorable黎會長 and beloved正社同學.

I. BACKGROUND:
In 1993, 培正商学院 attempted to adapt the prominent 校名and 校徽 of 培正 (商標爭奪). After legal challenges from 廣州培正中學, in 2005 they simply changed its name from培正商学院to Guangdong Pei Zheng College (广东培正学院) supported by Guangdong 教育部. Using similar tactic in year 2000, 杨国雄校監 and葉賜添校長had converted the original name of Pui Ching Education Center (培正教育中心) to Pui Ching Academy, PCA (培正專業書院). It was informed that they co-mingled funding rightfully donated to PC Primary School to benefit PCA. Their untimely business ambition has ended up a preparatory school with 3 paid students, a potential loan from HK government for 180 million HK dollars, and a drain of financial resource from the primary school.
The fact of the matter is damages have already been done! What can we do to rectify this unfortunate situation so PC can move forward! A few recommendations are listed below for your consideration.

II. COLLABORATION:
We are united under the red-and-blue banner (培正兒女一家親). 浸联會 was given the opportunity and responsibility by its predecessors to run PC and their authority is be respected. The righteous and forceful attitude of PC Alumnus Association (PCAA) is to be admired and praised. However, the confrontational positions between two parties may be counter-productive. The right way is for PCAA, 浸联會and校董會 to work together as a seamless team to find means of resolving differences and paying back the debt!

III. TERMINATION OF培正專業書院:
The united voices of PC classmates (全校團結) have been loud and clear in which the failing operation of PCA should be terminated ASAP. This will stop the financial bleeding of our primary school. The details of how to do this should be covered in the open forum on 2 August 2014 and finalized by the joint parties.
Once PCA operation is ceased, the eight floors can be used for the expansion of PC middle school and primary school as originally envisioned by the donators. They may be used as loan collateral or rental property to pay back the debts in a timely manner. It is also likely that PC finance may revert from debt into profit since real estate price has increased sharply aft the construction of the new building.
This will provide a concrete solution to the impasse between PCAA and浸联會. In simple words, PC will prosper if PCA is terminated.

IV. 校友論壇:
It is hoped that the upcoming 論壇 introduced by 黎會長 will be conducted in a cooperative, open, and peaceful manner. Relevant loan documents and necessary supporting papers should be produced and examined. The background and future actions by羅永祥校監 (羅校監may replace 楊国雄校監 in September 2014) should be revealed. 浸联會 and 校董會 have their rights to present their views, explain their actions, and make rebuttals, as necessary. But most importantly, they need to provide their road-maps leading toward the elimination of the debts and the betterment of PC. The PCAA representatives attending this open forum are undoubtedly some of the finest minds cultivated by PC tradition. With PCAA, 浸联會 and 校董會 working in unison, we shall proudly move forward!

V. ESTABLISH PC TRUST:
There exists an ambiguity of rightful interest and responsible control of PC. To safe guard the perpetuity of PC, a Trust must be established. It enables the legal control of all properties and financial resources by PC members; namely, 培正人治培正. New executives consisting of PC alumnus must be named to monitor the Trust and maintain operational transparency to all classmates. 浸联會 and 校董會should oversee this process thus ensuring a binding product fulfilling mutual interests.

VI. ESTABLISH GOVERNING COMMITTEE:
A governing system must be created that is composed of executive members from both parties (perhaps 3 from PCAA and 3 from 浸联會). They represent the interests of all PC members. Respective members may also render their views and supports in a democratic manner. This is to reform PC financial system, curtail similar incidences as stated above, uphold academic independence, prevent political infiltration on PC academic freedom, and maintain operational transparency. All of the above mentioned matters may be necessary to warrant the long-term survival and success of PC.

VII. ULTIMATE CONSEQUENCE:

Recently, 顧明均 and 錢世庸, prominent philanthropists and major donators of our new primary school building have expressed their strongest dissatisfaction of the actions by杨国雄 and葉賜添. 顧明均has filed law suits against杨 , 葉 and their associated party in order to recover the original funding. It is possible that錢世庸 may also follow suit. Their actions, if joint, will plunge PCA accompanists into disasters. The time is right for PCAA to seek a 顧-錢-PCAA Alliance and show PCA the absolute determination of the joint parties. This is critical for PC success!

杨is being replaced in September. 葉will retire next year and he wishes to step up as the president of PCA. If these two staunch creators and supporters of PCA depart PC, there is no basis for 校董會 and 浸联會to maintain a doomed business of zero value when the two retirement-aged supporters are entering into oblivion. Furthermore, PC members will not cease their firm supports to their beloved school. As a last resort and if above matters cannot be settled in a peaceful, timely and logical manner, multiple and joint law suits must proceed to seek final justice. This means should PCA accompanists hesitate to adopt policies that are best for PC; their authority will collapse under unrelenting protests and legal prosecutions!

The 校友論壇provides the first necessary and peaceful step towards a collaborative resolution to the specific concerns presented above. If all work together to best the interest of PC, future turbulence should subside. PC will promptly be on its way to financial recovery and academic prominence.

Unification and cooperation in order to rebuild PC may be the simplest and easiest solution to all concerned matters. It is hoped that positive results will be forthcoming in the near future.

A few small stones may cast ripples into the water. But thousands of them will send thundering sounds into the ocean.

Thank you in all sincerity and God bless培正,

John Sun (孫強) PhD, Los Angeles, 正社, Class 1960
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Max Cheung
Date: Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:33 PM
Subject: RE: Letter to 黎藉冠培正同學會長, 正社同學
To:Puiching Alumni
Dear President Lai;
Thank you for updating us with your timely information. Being away from Hong Kong for so many years, we are lucky to have loyal Hong Kong Alumnus like yourself to protect Pui Ching’s integrity and its best interests. I have also read the letter Dr. John Sun wrote you recently. Before his retirement, Dr. Sun worked for the Defense Industry of the US Government and several world renowned Aerospace companies. Dr. Sun is well known in his technical fields and acquired expertise administrative skills from all these organizations. After his retirement, Dr. Sun travels extensively all over the world. I know he is extremely proud of his Chinese heritage and his root to Pui Ching. In his letter, Dr. Sun outlined some of the most pragmatic solutions. Myself as well as many fellow Pui Ching Alumnus stand firmly by Dr. Sun’s concept. We hope that all is well with Pui Ching once the situation is resolved.
　
Sincerely,
Max Cheung (Zhengshe 1960)
　
Brief Note: Dr. Maxwell Cheung (張文昌 博士) 1960 正社. 1964 台湾成功大学機械系第一名 畢業及 美國加州理工大學 (California Institute of Technology) 航空機械系榮譽畢業. 獨立创造 深海油井顧問公司(Deep Sea Drilling and Marine Engineering Consulting). 与美國海軍合作擴大成數百員工的工程机構. 培正一向以教育數理 聞名. 但在留美工程事業界上 Maxwell 是最成功的例子.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: “Shuet Jin Lee
To: [email protected]; “[email protected]”
Subject: My Opinion for 8/2 Meeting concerning Pui Ching Primary School Reserve

培正同學會黎藉冠會長:

本人李雪珍 68 仁社校友. 以下乃本人對培正小學及大專事件意見. 主要分二部份:
1) 培正百年校譽。2） 培正小學資源的運用

1）校譽
請問該大專如何取得培正之名辦學? 據知此大專是浸聯旗下單位, 新成立的校名使用委員會有沒有權力中止該大專使用培正之名?
若該大專無權使用培正校名, 則委員會應立刻要求大專除名, 並向外界澄清這事實。而該大專的質素高低亦與培正無關。 相信校名委員會已訂好使用方針， 若有損百年培正之名，任何人都不能使用。

2）小學資源
浸聯會聲稱有權支配屬下機構資源，若 果 屬實的話, 小學校董會或監管小學財政單位應向浸聯會要求發出使用方針, 例如是否要支付浸聯旗下所有機構? 有否限額,條欵,合約手續規定等等. 若有爭論, 是由浸聯解決或是訴諸香港法律??

又是否各自記賬? 誰人監管? 支出的先後又如何決定?? 若小學儲備用光, 是否由浸聯別的單位支持?? 小學的儲備預計可以支撐多久?? 這些小學都要清清楚楚知道如何操作. 既然浸聯會自承有支配權利, 當然亦須提供實行方針.

另外一個問題是小學家長們知不知道小學學費有部分甚至全部都可能用於與培正小學完成無關的機構? 他們有沒有權反對這種支出??

最後一點: 該大專利用浸聯會權力強用有培正校友支持及參與建築的大樓, 因其與小學完全無關, 小學生的安全問題又如何保障??

以上愚見, 希望能在討論會中得到答案. 謝謝. 此祝

培正永為真理之干城！

仁社, 美京 Shuet Jin Lee李雪珍敬上

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
July 25, 2014.

Re: Pui Ching expansion

1. Strategy:

To challenge and delay the expansion ASAP in all fronts
To establish political transparency and thoroughly understand the governance
To establish financial transparency
To enhance the role of alumni association

2. Policy

To maintain vigilance by Alumni on Pui Ching Board activities for unilateral action
To support Pui Ching Junior and Middle School in keeping their resources and improve their academic excellence
To reduce alumni donation until further clarification

3. Operation

To elect/appoint ad hoc executive committee by Alumni
To organize fundraising activities by alumni and establish a ready war chest fund
To seek out commitment of alumni in general, beyond a few higher committed people
To promote election of more alumni into the School Board
To delay expansion for this first “critical” year and seek in-junction if possible in court

4. Tactics (cost $): It’s not cheap

To hire financial auditing by international firm, e.g. Deloitte, and keep ongoing monitor.
To go to court in multiple fronts by individual graduating years and force negotiation
To promote publicity in news media by PR firm and create uncertainty for first year registrants
To seek mandatory alumni representatives in Board (50%)
To move celebration activities on Pui Ching Alumni Day in December outside campus.

Namely, to delay, obstruct, protest and cost. At the very least, we can move forward after a warning shot and mitigate corruption. If this expansion moves ahead, it does so under a shadow.

Presently, there are also scholarships under teachers’ name, e.g. Lau Choi Yun, that remain hidden somewhere in the PC Treasury and may disappear quietly over time into some unknown pockets.

Respectfully yours,
Tsang, Ying Choi
Ho Society, 1966

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
　
From: 三藩市培正同學會會長周榮超
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Opinion for 8/2 Meeting concerning Pui Ching Primary School Reserve

Dear Michael:

It is great to be able to communicate with you on this and other matters. I am thrilled to hear about the forum to be held on 8/2. I would definitely attend if I were in Hong Kong.

There are a few questions that showed up in our meetings here in San Francisco and we would appreciate very much if you can shed some lights on them:

1. PC ACADEMY Since the beginning of Pui Ching Academy, how many students were there? At the present moment, how many faculties and how many students are there, including the 3 that enrolled last year? Also, how many courses are there in the offering?

2. ACCOUNTABILITY There were fund raising activities under the name of Pui Ching Academy. How much were collected and how was the fund being distributed and used? Judging from the recent law suit filed by Mr. Koo and his donation being $20,000,000 and his name is not even on the building, our guess is that there must be more than $50,000,000 in donated money. Is there any accounting on this amount?

3. DELAY We heard that the 2-year delay of the certificate of occupancy was due to deficiencies in the exiting requirement of the building. Can someone find out how the original architect, a residential specialist, was hired in the first place? Was he recommended by someone with connection to the Board or were his qualifications being checked before bringing him on board? There is definitely ground to sue him for damages from his negligence and lack of action.

4. TERMS OF LEASE Regarding the lease between PCPS and PC Academy, how much is the rent and how is the maintenance cost being shared, 40% vs 60%? Is PC Academy paying up?

Your effort in leading this fight is very much appreciated by all of us here in the San Francisco Bay Area. Thank you again.

Heston
　
HESTON CHAU
2014 President, SFPCAA
　
各位培正校友:

本人是 1967年恆社金維屏(James King) ，曾在銀樂隊吹奏 SousaPhon. Wisconsin, Michigan, NYU化工， MBA. 曾任職Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.中國及東亞區石化工程
業務總裁，銷售專利乙烯 (Ethylene Technolgy)工程計有:大慶，廣東石化， 茂名，成都，南京..。核能發電工程(不是由我負責):(代理 Westinghouse Nuclear Reactors):秦山，
台灣核電…

我愛培正，現時經常聯絡的朋友，多是當年培正書友。

本着至善至正，己所不欲，我要向上的精神，眾多校友回應信函，作了一些整理以精簡化，以求突顯出內容重點。
老師，我有幾個小問題，想吾通:

1.點解本學期 (2013-2014) , 培專剩得三個新生，香港教育署還發牌給他們開店。系人都知，香港
中，小學，課班唔夠學生，就有殺班埋單“野”.

2. 點解培中，培小，培專“既”校董，好似自家人，各戴唔同帽.“圍委喂”， … …“甘”都得?您話點服? ”
3.點解香港浸會總部，無人理“下“此單大件事，“佢”地可能想到事件金自動消失， Hey，這個睡獅經已醒”可去 Baptist Headquarters, 告御狀. www.ABC-USA.org

4.校董楊國雄，在建培小大樓疑涉利益沖突事件，(承建商疑是自己友?)(入伙紙遲出，建築商可有據合同賠款?)生果報亦有報導，點解無“左”音訊。好似無到。

5.校董楊國雄，今年初偷步按揭培小新廈計劃，下文是何?浸信會又有何交代?

6.如果有証據，點解，培正同學總會“吾”去 ICAC報案，若有家賊，都無得人情講。無面比.

7. 1967敏社刁正，曾任浸會大學十五年，都講大專經營之困境，何況培專是私立的，邊個俾銀兩來燒錢.
8.正系“人在做， 神在望””.

9.做好人， 有善終， 有過能改， 一笑泯恩仇，為的是我愛培正。 名同利， 都系身外物。你點睇? .

10. 各位校監，校董們，若果您們真心方培正.為基督，您們應保証您們的決策不是為您們舖好退休的好後路.

11.點解，點解，點解，? ? ?

各位校友，這可能是培正的”七七事變”, 恕我言重了.
金維屏 陳于 紐約市
July 29,2014

重申,
重組，解散培中，培小,培專“既”校董。各人只限任職其中一個校董席 (To prevent FURTHER conflict of interest, an individual should only have one seat of board of directors at Pui Ching Middle School or Pui Ching Primary School or Pui Ching Academy; but not any combination of the board. )
金維屏
　
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
　
From: william young
To: ” “[email protected]”
Subject: FW: 培正大專

主題：培正大專

培正同學會黎藉冠会長大鍳：

吾人捐建校舍，旨在助母校發展，增加學額，改善設施，提高質素，培育優才。惜事與願違，新校舍被違願使用，母校未能受惠，是可忍也，熟不可忍也，故應群起而攻之，務期纳入正軌。

抗争之目標正確，旗幟鲜明，然行之不易，氣勢雖雄壯，但效果成疑，蓋培正之老闆為浸聯會，培正物業之登記業主為浸联會，校友者，舊顧客也，同學會者，顧客聯誼會也，既非股東，又非校董，亦非職員，校董會内並無設校友席，母校行政决策，向無諮詢校友。今培正老闆，利用名下物業，擴充業務，親自操作，自負盈虧，舊顧客若横加阻止，其權力何來？正所謂 ‘驚破綠窗幽夢，吹縐一池春水，干卿底事’。

然則母校之興衰，校譽之浮沉，與校友之聲望攸關，吾人又不能坐視不理，任人擺佈。為此，謹略舒愚見如下:

1。支持顧大哥入禀討回捐款，如成功，其他捐款人應可效尤，以後母校募捐，會失校友支持，既可挫其銳氣，又可借傳媒之力，助抗爭之威。

2。争取於校董會內設校友席，以代表校友發聲，名正則言順，言順則事成。

3。以期臨淵羡鱼，不如退而結網。設立委員會，向政府批地，成立培正校友中小學，當家作主，設大球場，新型实驗室，提高科研水平，溶入社會知識，高中用英文課本，國語授課，鼓勵海外傳教士來校宣道，增强學生之英語講寫能力，發揮电腦智能，設宿舍安置華僑或國内同學，鼓勵學生入讀國内外名校，培育領袖人才。

我非教育界，敬祈有識之仕，不吝指正，以匡不遽。

楊康裔頓首 (1962旭社)
__________________________________________________________________________________________________